Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fast Shop S/AFast Shop S/A
VS
SEPHORASEPHORA
Fast Shop S/A

Fast Shop S/A

Avenida Zaki Narchi 1650, São Paulo, 02029-001, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fastshop.com.br
768/1000Fair

Somos uma empresa de varejo brasileira que, desde 1986, oferece produtos, serviços e soluções para facilitar o dia a dia dos nossos clientes com tecnologia e design inteligente. Temos como objetivo encantar cada cliente, e parte disso se traduz na experiência de compra...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:4,621
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
SEPHORA

SEPHORA

Neuilly sur Seine, 92576 , FR

Last Update: 08/06/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Sephora is the world’s leading global prestige beauty retail brand. With our curation of more than 500 brands and our own label, Sephora Collection, we offer the most unique and diverse range of prestige beauty products, tailored to our customers’ needs from fragrance t...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:49,309
Subsidiaries:75
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fast Shop S/A

Fast Shop S/A

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SEPHORA

SEPHORA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fast Shop S/A in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

SEPHORA has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Fast Shop S/A (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fast Shop S/A cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SEPHORA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SEPHORA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fast Shop S/A

Fast Shop S/A

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FAS0558722
SEPHORA

SEPHORA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SEPTHE1780490835
🔒 Incident : Breach
SEP1780946094
🔒 Incident : Breach
SEP2372423

FAQ

Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fast Shop S/A company and SEPHORA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fast Shop S/A and SEPHORA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fast Shop S/A and SEPHORA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fast Shop S/A or SEPHORA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fast Shop S/A or SEPHORA ?
Between Fast Shop S/A and SEPHORA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fast Shop S/A and SEPHORA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA