Comparison Overview
Exertis AV

Exertis AV
Technology House, Magnesium Way, Hapton, Burnley, BB12 7BF, GB
Last Update: 01/12/2025
Exertis are a global leader in AV and UC&C distribution, partnering with the leading brands and technologies on the market. Our global presence and team of more than 750 specialists ensure Exertis are best placed to advise, supply and support with all your client projec...

Cox Enterprises
6305 Peachtree Dunwoody Rd, Atlanta, 30328, US
Last Update: 06/09/2026
Thousands of employees, one goal: empower people today to build a better future for the next generation. How do we do that? By disrupting industries. By treating our employees as our most important resource. By improving the quality of life in our communities and by pro...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Exertis AV







Cox Enterprises






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Exertis AV in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Enterprises in 2026.
Incident History - Exertis AV (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Exertis AV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cox Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cox Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Exertis AV

Cox Enterprises
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.