Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Evernex » DEUEVE1784103988

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DEUEVE1784103988)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-60
Company Score Before Incident760 / 1000
Company Score After Incident700 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDEUEVE1784103988
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-party service provider compromise
DATA EXPOSEDEmployee email addresses, physical addresses,...
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2024
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Evernex's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Evernex Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Evernex breach identified under incident ID DEUEVE1784103988.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Evernex's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/evernex, the number of followers: 118265, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 1063 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 760 and after the incident was 700 with a difference of -60 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Evernex and their customers.

Deutsche Bank recently reported "Deutsche Bank Investigates Alleged Data Breach Linked to Unsafe Ransomware Gang", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Deutsche Bank is responding to claims by the Unsafe ransomware gang that its systems were breached, after the group listed the bank on its dark web leak site.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Employee email addresses, physical addresses, internal database records, password hashes.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Working with third-party provider to minimize potential cyber risks, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement denying internal network compromise.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Ongoing risks from third-party vulnerabilities in financial sector supply chains.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attributing the incident to a third-party service provider in Germany and Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including third-party service provider compromise, and supply chain such as true. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating password hashes...shared in screenshots. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating internal database records...compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating terminal commands suggesting database exports. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Likely (terminal commands suggesting database exports). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unsafe ransomware gang...align with ransomware operations. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-party service provider compromise (implied access via valid accounts) and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware operations often disable security tools. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Compromise Software Supply Chain (80%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (40%)