Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Esperance Communications » ESP1772051983

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ESP1772051983)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-156
Company Score Before Incident753 / 1000
Company Score After Incident597 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERESP1772051983
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORStealthy infiltration (RaaS)
DATA EXPOSEDMultiple organizations allegedly had data...
INCIDENT DATE20/02/2026
STATUSOngoing monitoring

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Esperance Communications's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Esperance Communications Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Esperance Communications breach identified under incident ID ESP1772051983.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Esperance Communications's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/esperance-communications, the number of followers: 53, the industry type: Telecommunications and the number of employees: 3 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 597 with a difference of -156 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Esperance Communications and their customers.

Esperance Communications recently reported "Qilin Ransomware Group Targets Multiple Australian Organizations in February", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

In late January and February, the Qilin ransomware group claimed attacks on four Australian organizations, primarily based in Western Australia.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Multiple organizations allegedly had data exfiltrated (40GB, 14GB+), with nearly 16,000+ files (Esperance Metaland) records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing monitoring.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating qilin uses stealthy infiltration tactics (RaaS) and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating average dwell time of 19 days before deploying ransomware. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating qilin ransomware binary remains effective. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating stealthy infiltration tactics, 19 days dwell time. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating stealthy infiltration tactics, 19 days dwell time. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating stealthy infiltration tactics, Qilin ransomware binary and Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (T1059.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating raaS operation with effective ransomware binary. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 19 days dwell time suggests credential harvesting. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 19 days dwell time, stealthy infiltration and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 16,000+ files exfiltrated (Esperance Metaland). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 40GB of data, 14GB+ and 16,000+ files exfiltrated. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration alleged (40GB, 14GB+). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating qilin ransomware group, ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Trusted Relationship (60%)
External Remote Services (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (60%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (60%)
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)

Sources & References