Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Ermi LLC. » ERM1787432341

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ERM1787432341)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-68
Company Score Before Incident695 / 1000
Company Score After Incident627 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERERM1787432341
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal and health-related information
INCIDENT DATE31/08/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Ermi LLC.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Ermi LLC. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Ermi LLC. breach identified under incident ID ERM1787432341.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Ermi LLC.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ermi-llc., the number of followers: 11513, the industry type: Medical Equipment Manufacturing and the number of employees: 172 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 695 and after the incident was 627 with a difference of -68 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Ermi LLC. and their customers.

ERMI recently reported "Patients Drop Data Breach Lawsuit Against Georgia Medical Billing Firm", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A group of patients has voluntarily dismissed a class-action lawsuit against ERMI, a Georgia-based medical billing company, alleging the firm failed to adequately protect sensitive patient and employee data.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal and health-related information.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Ongoing concerns about healthcare data security and risks of inadequate cybersecurity measures in medical billing operations.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating insufficient safeguards to prevent unauthorized access and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating security lapses led to a September data breach. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating insufficient safeguards to prevent unauthorized access. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal and health-related information exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposing personal and health-related information and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendors handling sensitive health data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating security lapses led to a data breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)