Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ERGO LatviaERGO Latvia
VS
AflacAflac
ERGO Latvia

ERGO Latvia

Skanstes iela 50, Riga, 1013, LV

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ergo.lv
752/1000Fair

ERGO ir viena no vadošajām apdrošinātāju grupām Baltijas reģionā, kas piedāvā plašu apdrošināšanas pakalpojumu klāstu, tai skaitā nedzīvības, dzīvības un veselības apdrošināšanu. ERGO pakalpojumiem, ekspertu zināšanām un finansiālajai stabilitātei Baltijas valstīs uztic...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aflac

Aflac

1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.aflac.com
376/1000Critical

Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:17,986
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
8
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ERGO Latvia

ERGO Latvia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aflac

Aflac

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ERGO Latvia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Aflac has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ERGO Latvia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ERGO Latvia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ERGO Latvia

ERGO Latvia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aflac

Aflac

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL1782816142
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ADOCONAFLSON1786027126
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AFLJAGNUC1768389868

FAQ

Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ERGO Latvia and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ERGO Latvia and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ERGO Latvia or Aflac ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ERGO Latvia or Aflac ?
Between ERGO Latvia and Aflac, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ERGO Latvia and Aflac, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94057
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94056
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94055
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94054
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-93993
SUMMARY

Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8