Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ERGO LatviaERGO Latvia
VS
AflacAflac
ERGO Latvia

ERGO Latvia

Skanstes iela 50, Riga, 1013, LV

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ergo.lv
752/1000Fair

ERGO ir viena no vadošajām apdrošinātāju grupām Baltijas reģionā, kas piedāvā plašu apdrošināšanas pakalpojumu klāstu, tai skaitā nedzīvības, dzīvības un veselības apdrošināšanu. ERGO pakalpojumiem, ekspertu zināšanām un finansiālajai stabilitātei Baltijas valstīs uztic...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aflac

Aflac

1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.aflac.com
424/1000Critical

Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:17,986
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ERGO Latvia

ERGO Latvia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aflac

Aflac

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ERGO Latvia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Aflac has 92.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ERGO Latvia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ERGO Latvia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ERGO Latvia

ERGO Latvia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aflac

Aflac

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL1782816142
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AFLJAGNUC1768389868
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL1768391547

FAQ

Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ERGO Latvia company and Aflac company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ERGO Latvia and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ERGO Latvia and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ERGO Latvia or Aflac ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ERGO Latvia or Aflac ?
Between ERGO Latvia and Aflac, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ERGO Latvia and Aflac, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-50044
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an inadequate encryption strength vulnerability which could allow an attacker to steal admin credentials via weak hash or a pass-the-hash attack.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-44955
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could allow for asset discovery by unauthenticated users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42933
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an unintended proxy or intermediary vulnerability which could allow an attacker to use an active proxy, which would bypass OT segmentation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-40430
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE Versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have a plaintext storage of a password vulnerability that could expose cleartext credentials through the API.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-28698
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could expose the underlying host/share filesystem.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9