Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Enterprise Security Tech » ENTSAL1773088371

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ENTSAL1773088371)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-58
Company Score Before Incident750 / 1000
Company Score After Incident692 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERENTSAL1773088371
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORMisconfigured Experience Cloud Sites
DATA EXPOSEDYes
INCIDENT DATE31/08/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Enterprise Security Tech's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Enterprise Security Tech Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Enterprise Security Tech breach identified under incident ID ENTSAL1773088371.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Enterprise Security Tech's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/enterprise-security-tech, the number of followers: 2913, the industry type: Internet Publishing and the number of employees: 2 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 692 with a difference of -58 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Enterprise Security Tech and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Salesforce Customers Targeted in Data Theft Campaign via Misconfigured Experience Cloud Sites", has drawn attention.

Salesforce has issued a warning about hackers exploiting misconfigured Experience Cloud platforms, which inadvertently grant guest users excessive data access.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Salesforce Experience Cloud platforms, and exposing Yes.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Disabling guest access to public APIs, Removing the API Enabled setting from guest profiles and Setting org-wide defaults to Private for external access, and began remediation that includes Auditing and restricting guest access to the principle of least privilege, Designating a Security Contact for rapid notifications and Monitoring for unusual access patterns.

The case underscores how Ongoing, and recommending next steps like Audit and restrict guest access to the principle of least privilege, Disable guest access to public APIs and remove the API Enabled setting from guest profiles and Set org-wide defaults to Private for external access.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exploiting misconfigured Experience Cloud platforms, and targeting the /s/sfsites/aura API endpoint and Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (T1078.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including inadvertently grant guest users excessive data access, and misconfigured guest user permissions. Under the Reconnaissance tactic, the analysis identified Active Scanning: Vulnerability Scanning (T1595.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating leveraging a modified version of AuraInspector to scan for misconfigured instances and Gather Victim Host Information: Software (T1592.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating using AuraInspector, an open-source auditing tool developed by Mandiant. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Group Policy Preferences (T1552.006) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating excessive data access for guest users due to misconfiguration. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters claims to have compromised 300–400 organizations and Data from Information Repositories: Confluence (T1213.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating targeting Salesforce Experience Cloud platforms for data theft. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including shinyHunters alleges ongoing data theft attacks, and bypassed Salesforce’s 2,000-record query limit and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating custom tool RapeForceV2.01.39 mimics naming of previous tools. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (T1078.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploiting misconfigured guest user permissions to evade detection and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating modified version of AuraInspector for reconnaissance. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential brand reputation impact due to data theft and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters claims to bypass query limits using sortBy parameter trick. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (80%)
Reconnaissance
Active Scanning: Vulnerability Scanning (90%)
Gather Victim Host Information: Software (70%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Group Policy Preferences (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories: Confluence (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (80%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (50%)
Impact
Defacement: Internal Defacement (40%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (30%)

Sources & References