Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » England and Great Britain Hockey » ENG1773354268

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ENG1773354268)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-108
Company Score Before Incident761 / 1000
Company Score After Incident653 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERENG1773354268
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED129GB of data allegedly stolen
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of England and Great Britain Hockey's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts England and Great Britain Hockey Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the England and Great Britain Hockey breach identified under incident ID ENG1773354268.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of England and Great Britain Hockey's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/england-hockey-ltd, the number of followers: 11405, the industry type: Spectator Sports and the number of employees: 318 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 761 and after the incident was 653 with a difference of -108 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on England and Great Britain Hockey and their customers.

England Hockey recently reported "England Hockey Potential Data Breach After AiLock Ransomware Claim", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

England Hockey, the national governing body for field hockey, is investigating a potential data breach after the AiLock ransomware gang listed the organization as a victim on its leak site.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 129GB of data allegedly stolen.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement confirming investigation.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential data breach after AiLock ransomware gang listed the organization and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating collaborating with external cybersecurity experts (potential supply chain risk). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware employs double-extortion tactics, encrypting files. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating threat actor claims to have stolen 129GB of data (implies access). Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware gang listed the organization as a victim (implies elevated access). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating files encrypted with ChaCha20 and NTRUEncrypt (.AILock extension) and Execution Guardrails (T1480) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating 72-hour response window and five-day payment deadline (tactical pressure). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 129GB of data allegedly stolen (implies credential harvesting). Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 129GB of data allegedly stolen (implies extensive discovery). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 129GB of data allegedly stolen from the organization. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threat actor listed the organization on its leak site (implies C2 communication). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 129GB of data allegedly stolen and threatened to be published. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating files encrypted with ChaCha20 and NTRUEncrypt (.AILock extension) and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack threatening the organizations existence. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (50%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (40%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Execution Guardrails (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Inhibit System Recovery (60%)

Sources & References