Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (EME1768392620)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Emera's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Emera Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Emera breach identified under incident ID EME1768392620.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Emera's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/emera, the number of followers: 28476, the industry type: Utilities Administration and the number of employees: 4514 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 766 and after the incident was 748 with a difference of -18 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Emera and their customers.
On 25 April 2024, Nova Scotia Power disclosed Cyberattack issues under the banner "Cyberattack on Nova Scotia Power and Emera".
Canadian electric utility Nova Scotia Power and its parent company Emera are responding to a disruptive cyberattack.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Business applications, customer care phone line, online portal.
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Impacted servers were shut down and isolated, and began remediation that includes Restoring impacted systems, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statements via company channels.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to portions of their business network and servers and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attack suggests possible ransomware incident (often uses valid accounts). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to business network and servers. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attack suggests possible ransomware incident (often maintains persistence). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating shutting down affected systems, leading to disruptions in IT services and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating nature of the attack suggests a possible ransomware incident. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating investigating whether customer or confidential business data was compromised. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating isolating and shutting down affected systems. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Emera Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/emera/incident/EME1768392620
- Emera CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/emera
- Emera Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/eme1768392620-emera-cyber-attack-may-2025/
- Emera CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/emera/history
- Emera CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.securityweek.com/canadian-electric-utility-hit-by-cyberattack/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf