Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Elementor » ELE1787322520

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ELE1787322520)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-4
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident751 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERELE1787322520
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORUnauthenticated exploitation via publicly accessible File Upload fields in Elementor Pro forms
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE18/08/2026
STATUSPatched

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Elementor's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Elementor Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Elementor breach identified under incident ID ELE1787322520.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Elementor's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/elementor, the number of followers: 76919, the industry type: Technology, Information and Internet and the number of employees: 459 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 751 with a difference of -4 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Elementor and their customers.

On 19 August 2026, Elementor Pro (WordPress Plugin) disclosed Zero-Day Vulnerability issues under the banner "Critical Zero-Day Vulnerability in Elementor Pro Plugin Enables Remote Code Execution".

A severe security flaw in Elementor Pro, a premium WordPress plugin, has been disclosed, allowing unauthenticated attackers to upload malicious PHP files and execute arbitrary code on vulnerable servers.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting WordPress websites using Elementor Pro ≤4.2.1.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Patch released in version 4.2.2, and began remediation that includes Update to Elementor Pro 4.2.2 or later; inspect `wp-content/uploads/elementor/forms/` for malicious files.

The case underscores how Patched, and recommending next steps like Immediately update to Elementor Pro 4.2.2 or later; disable multiple file upload if not needed; inspect upload directories for malicious files, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Update to Elementor Pro 4.2.2 or later; inspect upload directories for malicious files.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating severe security flaw in Elementor Pro...allowing unauthenticated attackers to upload malicious PHP files. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating execute arbitrary code on vulnerable servers...granting remote code execution (RCE) and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating malicious PHP files...executed if accessed via a browser. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating upload malicious PHP files...saved the malicious payload. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Masquerading (T1036) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating submitting multiple file parts...placing an empty entry first followed by a malicious PHP file and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating validation loop halts upon encountering the empty entry, bypassing checks. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating remote code execution (RCE) with the web server’s permissions. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (80%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (70%)
Persistence
Server Software Component: Web Shell (70%)
Defense Evasion
Masquerading (80%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (70%)

Sources & References