Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Elbit Systems of AmericaElbit Systems of America
VS
UK Ministry of DefenceUK Ministry of Defence
Elbit Systems of America

Elbit Systems of America

4700 Marine Creek Parkway, Fort Worth, 76179, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.elbitamerica.com
707/1000Moderate

Elbit Systems of America is a leading provider of high performance products and system solutions focusing on the defense, homeland security, commercial aviation and medical instrumentation markets. With facilities throughout the United States, Elbit Systems of America i...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:1,794
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
UK Ministry of Defence

UK Ministry of Defence

Ministry of Defence, London, SW1A 2HB, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.gov.uk/mod
304/1000Critical

We protect the security, independence and interests of the United Kingdom at home and abroad. We work with our allies and partners whenever possible. Our aim is to ensure that the UK’s Armed Forces have the training, equipment and support necessary for their work, a...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:30,294
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
12
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Elbit Systems of America

Elbit Systems of America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UK Ministry of Defence

UK Ministry of Defence

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elbit Systems of America in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

UK Ministry of Defence has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Elbit Systems of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elbit Systems of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UK Ministry of Defence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UK Ministry of Defence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Elbit Systems of America

Elbit Systems of America

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ELB233161222
🔒 Incident : Breach
ELB937072825
UK Ministry of Defence

UK Ministry of Defence

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FORGOV1783297461
🔒 Incident : Breach
UK-5234752110425
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UK-5562155102025

FAQ

Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Elbit Systems of America company and UK Ministry of Defence company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Elbit Systems of America and UK Ministry of Defence, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Elbit Systems of America and UK Ministry of Defence, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Elbit Systems of America or UK Ministry of Defence ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Elbit Systems of America or UK Ministry of Defence ?
Between Elbit Systems of America and UK Ministry of Defence, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Elbit Systems of America and UK Ministry of Defence, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2