Comparison Overview
Edible, Inc, a Daniel J. Edelman Holdings Company

Edible, Inc, a Daniel J. Edelman Holdings Company
Los Angeles, 90036, US
Last Update: 07/03/2026
Edible, Inc is a specialist agency within the Daniel J. Edelman Holdings family of companies focused entirely on the food, beverage and spirits sector. Edible brings together cross-discipline expertise, cutting edge thinking and innovative ideas to offer an integrated t...

Coca-Cola HBC
Turmstrasse 30, Zug, 6300, CH
Last Update: 14/09/2026
We bottle and sell the beverages of The Coca-Cola Company exclusively in our 29 markets and partner with other beverage businesses to also sell their brands. With over 100 brands covering eight categories – sparkling, water, juices, ready-to-drink tea, energy, plant-bas...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Edible, Inc, a Daniel J. Edelman Holdings Company







Coca-Cola HBC






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Edible, Inc, a Daniel J. Edelman Holdings Company in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Coca-Cola HBC in 2026.
Incident History - Edible, Inc, a Daniel J. Edelman Holdings Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Edible, Inc, a Daniel J. Edelman Holdings Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Coca-Cola HBC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Coca-Cola HBC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Edible, Inc, a Daniel J. Edelman Holdings Company

Coca-Cola HBC
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.