What is the official website of Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. ?

The official website of Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. is http://www.econergytech.com.

What is Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd.'s cybersecurity risk score?

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 741 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. operate in ?

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. operates primarily in the Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing industry.

How many employees does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. have ?

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. employs approximately 135 people worldwide.

Does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. own any subsidiaries ?

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. have ?

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd.'s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 16,042 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. ?

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. is classified under the NAICS code 33441, which corresponds to Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing.

Does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. have a Crunchbase profile ?

Yes, Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/econergy-renewable-energy.

Does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/econergy-renewable-energy-ltd.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. experienced ?

As of June 30, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. have ?

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. has an estimated 2,760 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

EREL

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

741

/1000

Moderate

766

/1000

Fair

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

econergytech.com

cb in

Add Your Compliance Badge

Econergy Group (TASE: ECNR) is a leading European Independent Power Producer (IPP) and active developer specializing in solar PV, wind, and energy storage projects across key European markets, including the UK, Italy, Spain, Romania, Poland, and Greece. With a robust project pipeline exceeding 8.2 GW in solar PV and wind and an additional 10.6 GWh in energy storage, we are at the forefront of driving Europe’s renewable energy transition. The company’s local teams in each operational country provide a strategic advantage, ensuring close collaboration with regulatory entities and local communities. Our solid strategic partnerships are key to securing project funding and further bolstering its financial stability. Additionally, the company

EREL A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

EREL

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Econergy Renewable ...

Cyber Attack

100

12/2025

ECO1769640092

Loading…

A.I.

EREL Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for EREL

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. in 2026.

Incident Types EREL vs Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. in 2026.

Incident History - EREL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. Subsidiaries

Parent Company

EREL

Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing

Website: http://www.econergytech.com

Company Size: 51-200 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. Similar Companies

Siemens Gamesa

cb siemensgamesa.com

Siemens Gamesa is a global technology leader in the renewable energy industry - specifically in the development, manufacturing, installation and maintenance of wind turbines. Being a pioneer in renewables since the 1980s, we put our scale and entrepreneurial culture to work on driving the energy transition towards a sustainable world. We empower our customers, people, and partners to lead the future with green energy. Siemens Gamesa is a trademark licensed by Siemens AG.

Loading…

NEWS

Econergy Renewable Energy Ltd. CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

May 07, 2025 07:00 AM

PainReform Launches Strategic AI Pilot with Econergy Using Its Proprietary DeepSolar™ Platform to Optimize One of Romania’s Largest Solar Projects

PainReform (NASDAQ: PRFX) has launched a strategic pilot program with Econergy Renewable Energy to implement its DeepSolar™ AI platform at...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8023

SUMMARY

Zephyr's HTTP server (subsys/net/lib/http) provides a static-filesystem resource type (HTTP_RESOURCE_TYPE_STATIC_FS, available when CONFIG_FILE_SYSTEM is enabled) that serves files from a configured root directory. Before this fix, both the HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 front-ends placed the raw, attacker-controlled request path into client-url_buffer (assembled in on_url() for HTTP/1 and copied verbatim from the :path pseudo-header for HTTP/2) without resolving ./.. segments. The static-FS handler then built the on-disk filename by directly concatenating the configured root with that raw URL (snprintk(fname, ..., "%s%s", static_fs_detail-fs_path, client-url_buffer) at http_server_http1.c:603 and http_server_http2.c:490) and opened it with fs_open(fname, FS_O_READ). Because the handler is reached via wildcard/leading-dir (fnmatch FNM_LEADING_DIR) or fallback resource matching, a request such as GET /<prefix/../../<file is dispatched to the handler and, after the underlying filesystem (e.g. LittleFS/FAT) resolves the .. segments, escapes the configured web root, letting an unauthenticated remote client read arbitrary readable files on the mounted volume (information disclosure). The HTTP server requires no TLS or authentication to reach this path. The fix adds http_server_remove_dot_segments(), which canonicalizes the path portion of the URL before resource lookup in both protocol handlers, neutralizing the traversal. Affects releases v4.0.0 through v4.4.0 for deployments that register a static-filesystem resource.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7656

SUMMARY

The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery handlers in subsys/net/ip/ipv6_nbr.c (handle_ra_input, handle_ns_input, handle_na_input) used an incorrect boolean expression that combined the RFC 4861 validity checks with the ICMPv6 code check using the wrong operator precedence: the form was '((length/hop/source/target checks) && (icmp_hdr-code != 0))'. Because every legitimate ND message carries ICMPv6 code 0, an attacker setting code == 0 (the normal value) caused the entire predicate to evaluate false, so the packet was never dropped and all of the other checks were silently skipped. The bypassed checks include the mandatory Hop Limit == 255 verification (which proves an ND packet originated on-link and was not forwarded) and, for Router Advertisements, the requirement that the source be a link-local address, as well as multicast-target sanity checks. As a result, an adjacent on-link attacker — and, because the Hop-Limit-255 guard is bypassed, potentially a remote/off-link attacker whose packets would otherwise be rejected — can have forged Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, and Neighbor Advertisement messages accepted. A forged RA lets the attacker reconfigure the victim's default router, on-link prefixes (SLAAC), MTU, reachable/retransmit timers, and (with CONFIG_NET_IPV6_RA_RDNSS) DNS servers, while forged NS/NA enable neighbor-cache poisoning, enabling man-in-the-middle, traffic redirection, and denial of service. The flaw is an input-validation/authentication weakness rather than a memory-safety issue: the underlying packet-parsing primitives (net_pkt_get_data, net_pkt_read, net_pkt_skip) are independently bounds-safe and the validated 'length' is the true buffer length, so skipping the length check causes no out-of-bounds access. The defect has existed since the logic was introduced in 2018 and shipped in all releases through v4.4.0; it is fixed by splitting the condition so any failing check drops the packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51219

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the HighPriorityASDUQueue_hasUnconfirmedIMessages function of lib60870 v2.3.3 to v2.3.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted payload.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51218

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the TS7Worker::PerformFunctionWrite() function (/core/s7_server.cpp) of snap7 v1.4.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10648

SUMMARY

mcumgr_serial_process_frag() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/serial_util.c calls net_buf_reset() on the result of smp_packet_alloc() before checking it for NULL. smp_packet_alloc() uses net_buf_alloc(K_NO_WAIT) against the shared MCUmgr packet pool (CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_NETBUF_COUNT, default 4), which returns NULL when the pool is exhausted. In default builds the __ASSERT_NO_MSG in net_buf_reset is a no-op, so net_buf_simple_reset writes through the NULL pointer (buf->len = 0; buf->data = buf->__buf), causing a fault/crash. The fragment data reaches this code from attacker-controlled bytes on the MCUmgr serial/UART/shell-console transports (smp_uart.c, smp_raw_uart.c, smp_shell.c), and a fresh buffer is allocated at the start of essentially every new packet. An attacker on the serial/console link can flood the transport to drive the 4-entry buffer pool to exhaustion and induce the NULL dereference, crashing the device (denial of service). The defect was introduced after the original MCUmgr rework and shipped in Zephyr v4.4.0. The fix moves the NULL check ahead of net_buf_reset.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.5

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…