Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » EBR Systems, Inc. » EBR1776256526

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (EBR1776256526)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-103
Company Score Before Incident759 / 1000
Company Score After Incident656 / 1000
Company LinkView EBR Systems, Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBEREBR1776256526
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal health information
INCIDENT DATE12/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of EBR Systems, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts EBR Systems, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the EBR Systems, Inc. breach identified under incident ID EBR1776256526.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of EBR Systems, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ebr-systems-inc-, the number of followers: 6267, the industry type: Medical Equipment Manufacturing and the number of employees: 156 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 759 and after the incident was 656 with a difference of -103 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on EBR Systems, Inc. and their customers.

On 15 May 2024, EBR Systems disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "EBR Systems Cybersecurity Incident Impacting Patient Health Data".

Medical technology firm EBR Systems disclosed a cybersecurity incident that may have exposed a limited amount of personal health information.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal health information, with nearly Limited (small volume based on initial reviews) records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of No material financial impact (covered by cybersecurity insurance).

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notified affected patients and published details on website.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notified affected patients.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access occurred and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating network disruption detected, prompting investigation. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access occurred (implied credential misuse). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal health information...exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating limited amount of personal health information exposed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating disclosed a cybersecurity incident publicly. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Defacement (40%)

Sources & References