Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Eastman Kodak Company » SALORAEAS1781684937

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SALORAEAS1781684937)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-12
Company Score Before Incident781 / 1000
Company Score After Incident769 / 1000
Company LinkView Eastman Kodak Company Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERSALORAEAS1781684937
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDOver 2.2 million records
INCIDENT DATE17/05/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Eastman Kodak Company's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Eastman Kodak Company Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Eastman Kodak Company breach identified under incident ID SALORAEAS1781684937.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Eastman Kodak Company's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/eastman-kodak, the number of followers: 152810, the industry type: Manufacturing and the number of employees: 8452 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 781 and after the incident was 769 with a difference of -12 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Eastman Kodak Company and their customers.

Eastman Kodak Company recently reported "Kodak Data Breach Investigation", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Eastman Kodak Company confirmed a security breach after unauthorized access to a portion of its data.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Over 2.2 million records, with nearly Over 2.2 million records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating exploiting a zero-day flaw in Oracle’s PeopleSoft software and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to a portion of its data. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters linked to breaches at Salesforce, Snowflake clients. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 2.2 million records containing customer PII and internal data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters threatened to leak data unless engaged and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data listed on dark web leak site alongside other breaches. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1471) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating extortion group claimed responsibility for data theft and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data encryption disclosed. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of ongoing threats to its systems and Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating kodak has not disclosed how attackers gained access. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Valid Accounts (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (40%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (60%)
Hide Artifacts (50%)

Sources & References