Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd.Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd.
VS
Anglo-EasternAnglo-Eastern
Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd.

Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd.

Nikis 2 & Poseidonos Avenue, Glyfada, Attica, 16675, GR

Last Update: 23/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dynacomtm.com
765/1000Fair

Dynacom Tankers Management Ltd. (DTM) was founded in 1991 to manage oil tankers. Since then, the fleet has been significantly expanded and modernized, and the company has developed a strong network of customer relationships and a reputation for transportation excellence...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,351
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Anglo-Eastern

Anglo-Eastern

17/F Kingston International Centre, 19 Wang Chiu Road, Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, ., HK

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.angloeastern.com
834/1000Good

Anglo-Eastern's rich maritime heritage spans over 50 years of ship management, crew management, cruise & leisure management and technical services. We manage a diverse fleet of vessels worldwide on behalf of our global partners, and uniquely offer both cadet and crew tr...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:Water Transportation
Employees:13,812
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd.

Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Anglo-Eastern

Anglo-Eastern

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anglo-Eastern in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Anglo-Eastern (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anglo-Eastern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd.

Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Anglo-Eastern

Anglo-Eastern

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ANG300092125

FAQ

Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. and Anglo-Eastern, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. and Anglo-Eastern, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. or Anglo-Eastern ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. or Anglo-Eastern ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. and Anglo-Eastern, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dynacom Tankers Management, Ltd. and Anglo-Eastern, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA