What is the official website of DWF ?

The official website of DWF is https://dwfgroup.com.

What is DWF's cybersecurity risk score?

DWF has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 765 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has DWF experienced?

According to Rankiteo, DWF currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has DWF been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, DWF has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does DWF have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DWF is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does DWF have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DWF does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does DWF comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, DWF is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does DWF have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DWF does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does DWF comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, DWF is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does DWF have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,DWF is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does DWF operate in ?

DWF operates primarily in the Law Practice industry.

How many employees does DWF have ?

DWF employs approximately 4,136 people worldwide.

Does DWF own any subsidiaries ?

DWF presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does DWF have ?

DWF's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 81,701 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for DWF ?

DWF is classified under the NAICS code 54111, which corresponds to Offices of Lawyers.

Does DWF have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, DWF does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does DWF have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, DWF maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dwf.

How many cybersecurity incidents has DWF experienced ?

As of June 30, 2026, Rankiteo reports that DWF has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does DWF have ?

DWF has an estimated 16,147 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

DWF

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

765

/1000

Fair

790

/1000

Fair

DWF Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

dwfgroup.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

DWF is a leading global provider of integrated legal and business services. We listen to our clients and there is a growing desire for legal and business services to be delivered in an easier and more efficient way. So, we've built our business and designed our range of services on this principle. We have three offerings – Legal Services, Legal Operations and Business Services. Our ability to seamlessly combine any number of these services to deliver bespoke solutions for our clients is our key differentiator. Delivered through our global teams across eight core sectors, our Integrated Legal Management approach delivers greater efficiency, price certainty and transparency for our clients without compromising on quality or

DWF A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

DWF

DWF CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

DWF Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for DWF

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DWF in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DWF in 2026.

Incident Types DWF vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DWF in 2026.

Incident History - DWF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

DWF Subsidiaries

Parent Company

DWF

Law Practice

Website: https://dwfgroup.com

Company Size: 4,136

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

DWF Similar Companies

DLA Piper

dlapiper.com

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border projects, critical transactions and high-stakes disputes. Every day we help trailblazing organizations seize business opportunities and successfully manage growth and change at speed. Through our pro bono work and community investment around the world, we help create a more just and sustainable future. Visit dlapiper.com to discover more.

Loading…

NEWS

DWF CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

November 05, 2025 08:00 AM

Market Maker DWF Reportedly Suffered Heavy $44M Crypto Hack Linked to North Korea’s AppleJeus

Crypto market maker DWF Labs has allegedly suffered a $44 million cyberattack linked to North Korea's Lazarus Group.

Read Article

November 04, 2025 08:00 AM

Researcher Uncovers Undisclosed $44 Million Hack of DWF Labs

The 2022 incident is allegedly linked to a DPRK group. 04.11.2025 ForkLog. In September 2022, market maker DWF Labs likely suffered a hack amounting to over...

Read Article

November 04, 2025 08:00 AM

DWF Labs Allegedly Lost $44 Million in Hack Tied to North Korea’s AppleJeus

North Korea-linked hackers allegedly stole $44 million from DWF Labs in 2022, marking one of crypto's most secretive breaches.

Read Article

October 03, 2025 07:00 AM

The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: Another Big Week For AI And California Startups

Want to keep track of the largest startup funding deals in 2025 with our curated list of $100 million-plus venture deals to U.S.-based...

Read Article

November 19, 2024 08:00 AM

Inside the world of a data protection lawyer

Tuğhan Thuraisingam, partner at DWF, discusses his unconventional journey into law, the importance of client exposure, developing the next generation of data...

Read Article

November 12, 2024 08:00 AM

The Big Commercial Awareness Themes of 2024-25 - with DWF, Goodwin Procter, Irwin Mitchell, Lewis Silkin, Morrison Foerster, TLT and ULaw

Tuesday 12 November, 3pm to 5:30pm, taking place virtually. THIS EVENT IS NOW FULLY BOOKED. Check out our upcoming fairs and student events.

Read Article

November 02, 2024 07:00 AM

What is DWF Labs? Exploring the Most Notorious Investment Fund in the Crypto Market

DWF Labs is one of the most famously aggressive cryptocurrency investment funds in the market, established in 2018 by Audrei Grachev and headquartered in...

Read Article

August 20, 2024 07:00 AM

Autodesk AutoCAD Vulnerability Let Attackers Execute Arbitrary Code

This vulnerability, CVE-2024-7305, identified in the AdDwfPdk.dll component, is triggered when a specially crafted DWF file is parsed.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8023

SUMMARY

Zephyr's HTTP server (subsys/net/lib/http) provides a static-filesystem resource type (HTTP_RESOURCE_TYPE_STATIC_FS, available when CONFIG_FILE_SYSTEM is enabled) that serves files from a configured root directory. Before this fix, both the HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 front-ends placed the raw, attacker-controlled request path into client-url_buffer (assembled in on_url() for HTTP/1 and copied verbatim from the :path pseudo-header for HTTP/2) without resolving ./.. segments. The static-FS handler then built the on-disk filename by directly concatenating the configured root with that raw URL (snprintk(fname, ..., "%s%s", static_fs_detail-fs_path, client-url_buffer) at http_server_http1.c:603 and http_server_http2.c:490) and opened it with fs_open(fname, FS_O_READ). Because the handler is reached via wildcard/leading-dir (fnmatch FNM_LEADING_DIR) or fallback resource matching, a request such as GET /<prefix/../../<file is dispatched to the handler and, after the underlying filesystem (e.g. LittleFS/FAT) resolves the .. segments, escapes the configured web root, letting an unauthenticated remote client read arbitrary readable files on the mounted volume (information disclosure). The HTTP server requires no TLS or authentication to reach this path. The fix adds http_server_remove_dot_segments(), which canonicalizes the path portion of the URL before resource lookup in both protocol handlers, neutralizing the traversal. Affects releases v4.0.0 through v4.4.0 for deployments that register a static-filesystem resource.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7656

SUMMARY

The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery handlers in subsys/net/ip/ipv6_nbr.c (handle_ra_input, handle_ns_input, handle_na_input) used an incorrect boolean expression that combined the RFC 4861 validity checks with the ICMPv6 code check using the wrong operator precedence: the form was '((length/hop/source/target checks) && (icmp_hdr-code != 0))'. Because every legitimate ND message carries ICMPv6 code 0, an attacker setting code == 0 (the normal value) caused the entire predicate to evaluate false, so the packet was never dropped and all of the other checks were silently skipped. The bypassed checks include the mandatory Hop Limit == 255 verification (which proves an ND packet originated on-link and was not forwarded) and, for Router Advertisements, the requirement that the source be a link-local address, as well as multicast-target sanity checks. As a result, an adjacent on-link attacker — and, because the Hop-Limit-255 guard is bypassed, potentially a remote/off-link attacker whose packets would otherwise be rejected — can have forged Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, and Neighbor Advertisement messages accepted. A forged RA lets the attacker reconfigure the victim's default router, on-link prefixes (SLAAC), MTU, reachable/retransmit timers, and (with CONFIG_NET_IPV6_RA_RDNSS) DNS servers, while forged NS/NA enable neighbor-cache poisoning, enabling man-in-the-middle, traffic redirection, and denial of service. The flaw is an input-validation/authentication weakness rather than a memory-safety issue: the underlying packet-parsing primitives (net_pkt_get_data, net_pkt_read, net_pkt_skip) are independently bounds-safe and the validated 'length' is the true buffer length, so skipping the length check causes no out-of-bounds access. The defect has existed since the logic was introduced in 2018 and shipped in all releases through v4.4.0; it is fixed by splitting the condition so any failing check drops the packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51219

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the HighPriorityASDUQueue_hasUnconfirmedIMessages function of lib60870 v2.3.3 to v2.3.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted payload.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51218

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the TS7Worker::PerformFunctionWrite() function (/core/s7_server.cpp) of snap7 v1.4.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10648

SUMMARY

mcumgr_serial_process_frag() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/serial_util.c calls net_buf_reset() on the result of smp_packet_alloc() before checking it for NULL. smp_packet_alloc() uses net_buf_alloc(K_NO_WAIT) against the shared MCUmgr packet pool (CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_NETBUF_COUNT, default 4), which returns NULL when the pool is exhausted. In default builds the __ASSERT_NO_MSG in net_buf_reset is a no-op, so net_buf_simple_reset writes through the NULL pointer (buf->len = 0; buf->data = buf->__buf), causing a fault/crash. The fragment data reaches this code from attacker-controlled bytes on the MCUmgr serial/UART/shell-console transports (smp_uart.c, smp_raw_uart.c, smp_shell.c), and a fresh buffer is allocated at the start of essentially every new packet. An attacker on the serial/console link can flood the transport to drive the 4-entry buffer pool to exhaustion and induce the NULL dereference, crashing the device (denial of service). The defect was introduced after the original MCUmgr rework and shipped in Zephyr v4.4.0. The fix moves the NULL check ahead of net_buf_reset.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.5

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

DWF Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

DWF A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

DWF CyberSecurity News & History

DWF Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for DWF

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types DWF vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - DWF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DWF Subsidiaries

Parent Company

DWF

DWF Similar Companies

DLA Piper

DWF CyberSecurity News

Market Maker DWF Reportedly Suffered Heavy $44M Crypto Hack Linked to North Korea’s AppleJeus

Researcher Uncovers Undisclosed $44 Million Hack of DWF Labs

DWF Labs Allegedly Lost $44 Million in Hack Tied to North Korea’s AppleJeus

The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: Another Big Week For AI And California Startups

Top commercial awareness topics to watch for this training contract application season

Inside the world of a data protection lawyer

The Big Commercial Awareness Themes of 2024-25 - with DWF, Goodwin Procter, Irwin Mitchell, Lewis Silkin, Morrison Foerster, TLT and ULaw

What is DWF Labs? Exploring the Most Notorious Investment Fund in the Crypto Market

Autodesk AutoCAD Vulnerability Let Attackers Execute Arbitrary Code

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

DWF CyberSecurity News & History

DWF Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for DWF

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types DWF vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - DWF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DWF Subsidiaries

Parent Company

DWF

DWF Similar Companies

DLA Piper

DWF CyberSecurity News

Market Maker DWF Reportedly Suffered Heavy $44M Crypto Hack Linked to North Korea’s AppleJeus

Researcher Uncovers Undisclosed $44 Million Hack of DWF Labs

DWF Labs Allegedly Lost $44 Million in Hack Tied to North Korea’s AppleJeus

The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: Another Big Week For AI And California Startups

Top commercial awareness topics to watch for this training contract application season

Inside the world of a data protection lawyer

The Big Commercial Awareness Themes of 2024-25 - with DWF, Goodwin Procter, Irwin Mitchell, Lewis Silkin, Morrison Foerster, TLT and ULaw

What is DWF Labs? Exploring the Most Notorious Investment Fund in the Crypto Market

Autodesk AutoCAD Vulnerability Let Attackers Execute Arbitrary Code

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo