Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Dutch Health BV » CHIDUT1775839803

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CHIDUT1775839803)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-98
Company Score Before Incident746 / 1000
Company Score After Incident648 / 1000
Company LinkView Dutch Health BV Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERCHIDUT1775839803
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2023
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Dutch Health BV's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Dutch Health BV Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Dutch Health BV breach identified under incident ID CHIDUT1775839803.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Dutch Health BV's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dutch-health-bv, the number of followers: 511, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 13 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 746 and after the incident was 648 with a difference of -98 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Dutch Health BV and their customers.

ChipSoft recently reported "Ransomware Attack Disrupts ChipSoft EHR Services Across Dutch and Belgian Hospitals", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A ransomware attack on ChipSoft, a leading provider of electronic health record (EHR) software, has caused widespread disruptions to healthcare services in the Netherlands and Belgium.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting EHR systems.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including supply chain such as true, and leading provider of electronic health record (EHR) software and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including eHR systems affected, and vulnerabilities in third-party software providers. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including ransomware attack on ChipSoft, and forced hospitals to take critical systems offline. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including type such as Ransomware, and data encryption such as null (implied by ransomware), Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating widespread disruptions to healthcare services, and Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating forced hospitals to take critical systems offline. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating details on data exfiltration remain undisclosed (implied). Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating impacted multiple hospitals via EHR software. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Defacement (30%)
Endpoint Denial of Service (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (70%)

Sources & References