Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » du » DU1182011112325

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DU1182011112325)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-98
Company Score Before Incident786 / 1000
Company Score After Incident688 / 1000
Company LinkView du Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERDU1182011112325
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE20/11/2025
STATUSongoing (threat actor issued public statement; no confirmation of data leak yet)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of du's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts du Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the du breach identified under incident ID DU1182011112325.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of du's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/du, the number of followers: 433593, the industry type: Telecommunications and the number of employees: 7059 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 786 and after the incident was 688 with a difference of -98 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on du and their customers.

On 21 November 2025, Emirates Integrated Telecommunications Company P.J.S.C. disclosed ransomware issues under the banner "Ransomware Attack on Emirates Integrated Telecommunications Company (du.ae) by DragonForce".

On November 21, 2025, the ransomware group DragonForce publicly claimed responsibility for a cyberattack against Emirates Integrated Telecommunications Company P.J.S.C.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

In response, and began remediation that includes monitor dark web/infostealer activity (DeXpose platform), conduct compromise assessment (incident review) and validate backups (ensure encryption, offline/immutable storage).

The case underscores how ongoing (threat actor issued public statement; no confirmation of data leak yet), and recommending next steps like Monitor dark web/infostealer activity in real-time (e.g., DeXpose), Conduct immediate compromise assessments to identify infiltration vectors and persistence mechanisms and Validate backups (ensure offline, encrypted, immutable storage).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating vulnerabilities in ... employee credential security, as attackers likely exploited phishing and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploited ... dark web-sourced credentials. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating vulnerabilities in ... employee credential security and Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials (T1589.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including monitor dark web/infostealer activity (DeXpose platform), and dark web-sourced credentials. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating exploited ... dark web-sourced credentials to bypass authentication and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware deployment implies potential tampering with security tools (implied by remediation such as apply threat intelligence (integrate IOCs)). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol (T1048.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating threatened to leak sensitive company data, exfiltrated corporate and customer data (financial records, PII, telecom infrastructure details). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group DragonForce, threatened to release sensitive data unless negotiations initiated and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack implies potential data destruction if ransom unpaid (implied by threatened to leak). Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploited ... dark web-sourced credentials for sustained access. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Windows Remote Management (T1021.006) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware spread implies lateral movement (implied by proprietary telecom infrastructure details at risk). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References