Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Drift, a Salesloft company » ZSCPALDRISAL1773852939

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ZSCPALDRISAL1773852939)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-62
Company Score Before Incident756 / 1000
Company Score After Incident694 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERZSCPALDRISAL1773852939
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTOROAuth Token Theft
DATA EXPOSEDPII, Customer Data, OAuth Tokens,...
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2024
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Drift, a Salesloft company's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Drift, a Salesloft company Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Drift, a Salesloft company breach identified under incident ID ZSCPALDRISAL1773852939.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Drift, a Salesloft company's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/drift, the number of followers: 91827, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 277 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 694 with a difference of -62 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Drift, a Salesloft company and their customers.

Salesloft recently reported "The Great SaaS Breach of 2025: How a Single OAuth Token Compromised 700+ Organizations", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A new report from Grip Security reveals alarming trends in SaaS security, analyzing 23,000 SaaS environments and uncovering critical vulnerabilities.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Salesforce, Slack, Drift Chatbot, AWS Environments, and exposing PII, Customer Data, OAuth Tokens, Refresh Tokens.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as The incident underscores the risks of shadow AI and IdentityMesh, where AI-embedded SaaS applications lack formal oversight. OAuth tokens, treated as routine access credentials, can become critical weak links if stolen. The attack highlights the need for dynamic governance, continuous oversight, and risk-based controls to manage AI as a third-party risk, and recommending next steps like Replace static approvals with dynamic governance, implement continuous oversight, and adopt risk-based controls for AI-enabled SaaS environments. Treat AI as a managed third-party risk to mitigate cascading breaches.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including compromised Salesloft’s GitHub repositories, and supply chain such as true and Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating stole OAuth and refresh tokens used by customers to connect Drift Chatbot. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating oAuth and refresh tokens stolen from Drift’s AWS environment and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating oAuth tokens treated as routine access credentials, weak link. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (T1550.001) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating legitimate OAuth token used to impersonate Drift, breach Salesforce and Account Discovery: Cloud Account (T1087.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating cascaded through connected systems via IdentityMesh. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (T1213.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pII or customer data involved in 80% of incidents and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating oAuth tokens and customer data compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating breached Salesforce installations across 700+ organizations and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cascading breaches through connected systems. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (T1550.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating legitimate OAuth token used to impersonate Drift and Hide Artifacts: Email Hiding Rules (T1564.008) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating aI-embedded SaaS apps adopted without auditing security. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cascading breaches via IdentityMesh, 700+ organizations and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating blast radius of a single breach will only grow. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (90%)
Steal Application Access Token (95%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (95%)
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (80%)
Lateral Movement
Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (95%)
Account Discovery: Cloud Account (80%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (70%)
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (80%)
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (90%)
Hide Artifacts: Email Hiding Rules (60%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (70%)
Data Destruction (50%)

Sources & References