Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Drift, a Salesloft companyDrift, a Salesloft company
VS
PayPalPayPal
Drift, a Salesloft company

Drift, a Salesloft company

222 Berkley Street, Boston, 02116, US

Last Update: 10/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.drift.com/
396/1000Critical

Drift®, the buyer experience and Conversational AI company, inspires businesses to create more engaging customer experiences, one conversation at a time. Drift helps thousands of customers across the globe translate conversational data and buyer behavior into deeper rel...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:275
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3
PayPal

PayPal

2211 North First Street, San Jose, CA, US, 95131

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
548/1000Critical

We're championing possibilities for all by making money fast, easy, and more enjoyable. Our hope is to unlock opportunities for people in their everyday lives and empower the millions of people and businesses around the world who trust, rely, and use PayPal every day. ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:36,670
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Drift, a Salesloft company

Drift, a Salesloft company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PayPal

PayPal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Drift, a Salesloft company has 183.02% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

PayPal has 482.52% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Drift, a Salesloft company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Drift, a Salesloft company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PayPal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PayPal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Drift, a Salesloft company

Drift, a Salesloft company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DRI1775442259
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAL1773146972
🔒 Incident : Breach
TEL1773332910
PayPal

PayPal

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NORPAYSHOAPPMCA1782469522
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LIVPAY1773735888
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAY1771967012

FAQ

Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company company and PayPal company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company and PayPal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company and PayPal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Drift, a Salesloft company or PayPal ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Drift, a Salesloft company or PayPal ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company and PayPal, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Drift, a Salesloft company and PayPal, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9