Comparison Overview
Defence Research and Development Canada | Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada

Defence Research and Development Canada | Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada
Major-General George R. Pearkes Building, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0K2, CA
Last Update: 11/03/2026
Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) is the national leader in defence and security science and technology. As the science and technology organization of Canada’s Department of National Defence (DND), DRDC provides DND, the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), other g...

UK Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence, Whitehall, London, GB, SW1A 2HB
Last Update: 13/07/2026
We defend the United Kingdom and its allies, at home and abroad.
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Defence Research and Development Canada | Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada







UK Ministry of Defence






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Defence Research and Development Canada | Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada in 2026.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
UK Ministry of Defence has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Defence Research and Development Canada | Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Defence Research and Development Canada | Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - UK Ministry of Defence (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UK Ministry of Defence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Defence Research and Development Canada | Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada

UK Ministry of Defence
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.
JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/3ea9cad8699714dc072fade29d36be0d1e23d708
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/733eb353dca7b0ea0252e724445b6defa29c393e
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/86b7ba7801988aadb1a67555629522a71d603bd3
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/pull/2000
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.0.16
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.2.1
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/security/advisories/GHSA-2r2c-cx56-8933
JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/0389f0ee6d0375901b602671ad5dafd4d1d4ee09
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/4ee3a73849ffb9a85ec748e4e8cd8f6d81f84f40
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/934f09e6128cee33c2b13d42b6e859c1ee2d194b
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/pull/2000
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/pull/2001
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.0.16
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.2.1
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/jline-3.30.14
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/security/advisories/GHSA-47qp-hqvx-6r3f
Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.