Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Drakontas LLC » DRAUNISHA1779027889

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DRAUNISHA1779027889)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact0
Company Score Before Incident100 / 1000
Company Score After Incident100 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDRAUNISHA1779027889
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORRansomware-as-a-Service (RaaS), Internet-facing PLCs, Remote Access Pathways, Engineering Workstations
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE28/02/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Drakontas LLC's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Drakontas LLC Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Drakontas LLC breach identified under incident ID DRAUNISHA1779027889.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Drakontas LLC's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/drakontas-llc, the number of followers: 439, the industry type: Public Safety and the number of employees: 8 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Drakontas LLC and their customers.

Shamir Medical Center recently reported "Ransomware as a Geopolitical Weapon: Nation-State Exploitation of Cybercrime for Strategic Coercion", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Ransomware has evolved from a financial extortion tool to a geopolitical weapon used by nation-states to disrupt adversaries while maintaining plausible deniability.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Water and wastewater systems, Energy sectors and Fuel systems.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Disconnecting internet-facing PLCs and Tightening remote access controls, and began remediation that includes Improving IT-OT segmentation and Enhancing recovery capabilities for OT systems.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Distinguishing between state-directed campaigns and opportunistic cybercrime is increasingly difficult due to shared tooling, access brokers, and RaaS models. Resilience and recovery capabilities are critical for OT systems where traditional IT restoration methods fall short, and recommending next steps like Disconnect internet-facing PLCs and tighten remote access controls, Improve IT-OT segmentation and treat CISA advisories as operational baselines and Enhance recovery capabilities for OT systems.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating internet-facing PLCs, HMIs, remote access pathways targeted, External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating remote access pathways exploited for initial access, and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating poor IT-OT segmentation implies compromised credentials. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating engineering workstations targeted for execution and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) model implies user execution. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromised credentials likely used for persistence and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating remote access pathways maintained for persistence. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating lack of authentication/logging in OT systems enables escalation and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised credentials used for privilege escalation. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised credentials used to evade detection, Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating lack of logging in OT systems impairs defenses, and Masquerading (T1036) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating raaS models obscure attribution and evade detection. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating poor IT-OT segmentation implies credential compromise and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating compromised engineering workstations may enable dumping. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating internet-facing PLCs targeted for discovery and Network Service Scanning (T1046) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating remote access pathways scanned for vulnerable systems. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating poor IT-OT segmentation enables lateral movement and Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating remote access pathways exploited for movement. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware encryption confirmed in multiple strains, Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating geopolitical coercion implies potential defacement, and Data Destruction (T0881) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating industrial sabotage intent suggests data destruction. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating strategic disruption implies data exfiltration and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating internet-connected devices used for exfiltration. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
External Remote Services (80%)
Valid Accounts (70%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (70%)
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (70%)
External Remote Services (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (70%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (80%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Masquerading (70%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (60%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Network Service Scanning (80%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (80%)
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Defacement (50%)
Data Destruction (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)