Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DRA1776206511)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Dragonfly's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Dragonfly Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Dragonfly breach identified under incident ID DRA1776206511.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Dragonfly's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dragonfly-capital-partners, the number of followers: 41022, the industry type: Venture Capital and Private Equity Principals and the number of employees: 151 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 748 and after the incident was 688 with a difference of -60 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Dragonfly and their customers.
On 10 April 2026, Dragonfly Digital Management LLC disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Dragonfly Digital Management Data Breach".
Dragonfly Digital Management LLC, a San Francisco-based SEC-registered cryptocurrency and blockchain venture capital firm, revealed a data breach that may have exposed sensitive personal and financial information.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personal and financial information, plus an estimated financial loss of No loss of funds reported.
In response, and began remediation that includes Offering 24 months of complimentary identity protection and credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks, and stakeholders are being briefed through Consumer notifications issued on April 10, 2026.
The case underscores how Ongoing (forensic investigation by CrowdStrike), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals must enroll in identity protection by July 31, 2026, and report suspicious communications to Scott Hershorin at Dragonfly.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to data collected through Dragonfly’s compliance processes and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach involving sensitive personal and financial information. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exposed Taxpayer identification or Social Security numbers and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating government-issued IDs (passports, driver’s licenses) compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating names, phone numbers, email addresses, physical addresses compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data collected through Dragonfly’s compliance processes exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal and financial information exposed in breach and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating blockchain venture capital firm with potential cloud storage exposure. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no loss of funds reported, but high identity theft risk and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential unauthorized access to compliance data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Dragonfly Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/dragonfly-capital-partners/incident/DRA1776206511
- Dragonfly CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/dragonfly-capital-partners
- Dragonfly Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/dra1776206511-dragonfly-digital-management-llc-breach-january-2026/
- Dragonfly CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/dragonfly-capital-partners/history
- Dragonfly CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/data-breach/dragonfly-digital-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf