Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DRA1776205993)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Dragonfly Asset Management's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Dragonfly Asset Management Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Dragonfly Asset Management breach identified under incident ID DRA1776205993.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Dragonfly Asset Management's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dragonfly-asset-management, the number of followers: 566, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 7 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 752 and after the incident was 681 with a difference of -71 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Dragonfly Asset Management and their customers.
On 16 January 2026, Dragonfly Digital Management, LLC disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Dragonfly Digital Management Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Personal Information".
On January 16, 2026, Dragonfly Digital Management, LLC detected a data security incident where an unauthorized individual accessed personally identifiable information (PII) collected during routine business operations, including due diligence and compliance checks.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), plus an estimated financial loss of No funds lost.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notified affected individuals.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notified affected individuals.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized individual accessed personally identifiable information and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating routine business operations, including due diligence and compliance checks. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating driver’s licenses, passport copies, Social Security numbers compromised and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating bank and financial account numbers, taxpayer identification numbers exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating pII collected during routine business operations was accessed and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating due diligence and compliance checks data compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized individual accessed PII; no evidence of data exfiltration details and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating crypto/financial sector breach; cloud storage possible. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no funds lost; no evidence of data destruction and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk; potential for data tampering. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Dragonfly Asset Management Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/dragonfly-asset-management/incident/DRA1776205993
- Dragonfly Asset Management CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/dragonfly-asset-management
- Dragonfly Asset Management Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/dra1776205993-dragonfly-digital-management-llc-breach-january-2026/
- Dragonfly Asset Management CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/dragonfly-asset-management/history
- Dragonfly Asset Management CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/investigations/dragonfly-digital-data-breach-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf