Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DOI1788857361)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Doimo Cucine's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Doimo Cucine Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Doimo Cucine breach identified under incident ID DOI1788857361.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Doimo Cucine's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/doimo-cucine, the number of followers: 5334, the industry type: Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing and the number of employees: 62 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 656 with a difference of -98 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Doimo Cucine and their customers.
On 01 September 2026, Doimo Cucine disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Panzer Ransomware Emerges as a Growing Threat to Global Enterprises".
A new ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) group, Panzer, has rapidly gained attention since its debut in August 2026, contributing to a surge in cyberattacks targeting Italian organizations.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Windows, Linux and VMware ESXi, and exposing 30 GB (Doimo Cucine) and 16 GB (NTE Italia).
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Backups alone do not prevent data exposure in double-extortion attacks. Behavior-based detection is critical due to lack of verified malware indicators, and recommending next steps like Monitor for unusual VPN logins and unauthorized admin accounts, Detect unexpected remote management tools (e.g., ScreenConnect, AnyDesk) and Investigate large archive files in user directories and Rclone execution.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating credential dumping, brute-force attacks, remote service abuse and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unusual VPN logins, unauthorized admin accounts. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating panzer malware supports Windows, Linux, VMware ESXi, FreeBSD and User Execution (T1204) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating affiliates gain access via Tox messaging. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized admin accounts, remote service abuse and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unexpected remote management tools (e.g., ScreenConnect, AnyDesk). Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating credential dumping, brute-force attacks and Create or Modify System Process (T1543) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating eSXi hypervisor targeting for VM encryption. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating security tool disablement suspected and Indicator Removal (T1070) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating no verified malware hashes, C2 servers published. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating credential dumping, brute-force attacks and Brute Force (T1110) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating brute-force attacks listed as attack vector. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized admin accounts, remote service abuse and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating large archive files in user directories. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 30 GB of data stolen from Doimo Cucine, 16 GB from NTE Italia and Data Staged (T1074) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating large archive files in user directories. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating tox messaging for affiliate recruitment and Ingress Tool Transfer (T1105) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unexpected remote management tools (e.g., ScreenConnect, AnyDesk). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed, 30 GB and 16 GB stolen, Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unusual outbound transfers to cloud storage, and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rclone execution, cloud storage transfers. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption confirmed, ESXi hypervisor targeting and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating eSXi hypervisor encryption disrupts critical services. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Doimo Cucine Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/doimo-cucine/incident/DOI1788857361
- Doimo Cucine CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/doimo-cucine
- Doimo Cucine Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/doi1788857361-doimo-cucine-ransomware-august-2026/
- Doimo Cucine CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/doimo-cucine/history
- Doimo Cucine CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://cyberpress.org/panzer-ransomware-hits-enterprises/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf