Docker, Inc
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
docker
Website:
Employees number:
949
Number of followers:
759,100
NAICS:
5112
Industry Type:
Homepage:
docker.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
DOC_7591244
Scan Status:
In-progress
Docker, Inc Company CyberSecurity Posture
docker.com
At Docker, we simplify the lives of developers who are making world-changing apps. Docker helps developers bring their ideas to reality by conquering the complexity of app development. We simplify and accelerate workflows with an integrated development pipeline and application components. Actively used by millions of developers around the world, Docker Desktop and Docker Hub provide unmatched simplicity, agility and choice.
Docker, Inc A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Docker, Inc Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
Docker, Inc
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Docker, Inc Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Docker, Inc
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Docker, Inc Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
Docker
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks: - Attack which causes leak of personal information of customers (only if no ransomware) - Attack by hackers which causes data leak of customer information (only if no ransomware)
Description: Docker was affected by CVE-2025-62725, a critical path traversal vulnerability in Docker Compose (fixed in v2.40.2) that allowed attackers to escape the tool’s cache directory and write arbitrary files on the host system by exploiting malicious OCI-based Compose artifacts. The flaw stemmed from improper handling of layer annotations, enabling attackers to traverse outside the intended directory and overwrite files where the Compose process had write permissions. This posed a severe risk to workflows relying on Compose including CI/CD pipelines, cloud workspaces, and enterprise build systems potentially leading to unauthorized code execution, system compromise, or supply-chain attacks if exploited. Separately, Docker also patched EUVD-2025-36191, a DLL hijacking vulnerability in its Windows Installer (Desktop Installer.exe), which allowed attackers to escalate privileges by planting malicious DLLs in the user’s Downloads folder. Both flaws underscored the risks of unvalidated input handling and insecure default configurations, reinforcing the need for strict path sanitization and timely updates. While no active exploits were reported, the vulnerabilities exposed millions of Docker users to potential system takeover, data manipulation, or lateral movement within networks if left unpatched.
Docker, Inc Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Docker, Inc
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Docker, Inc in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Docker, Inc in 2026.
Incident Types Docker, Inc vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Docker, Inc in 2026.
Incident History — Docker, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Docker, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Docker, Inc Company Subsidiaries
At Docker, we simplify the lives of developers who are making world-changing apps. Docker helps developers bring their ideas to reality by conquering the complexity of app development. We simplify and accelerate workflows with an integrated development pipeline and application components. Actively used by millions of developers around the world, Docker Desktop and Docker Hub provide unmatched simplicity, agility and choice.
Loading...
Docker, Inc Similar Companies
NiCE
NiCE is transforming the world with AI that puts people first. Our purpose-built AI-powered platforms automate engagements into proactive, safe, intelligent actions, empowering individuals and organizations to innovate and act, from interaction to resolution. Trusted by organizations throughout 150
IDEMIA Secure Transactions (IST) is a leading provider of payment, connectivity, and cybersecurity solutions, serving billions of people worldwide. With decades of expertise in cryptography and credential issuance, IST is trusted by over 2000 financial institutions, mobile operators, automotive manu
A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that makes you unique. Together, we c
Pitney Bowes is a technology-driven company that provides digital shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the world – including more than 90 percent of the Fortune 500. Small businesses to large enterprises, and government entities rely on Pitney Bowes to red
Founded in 2015, Daraz is the leading e-commerce platform in South Asia with operations in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Myanmar. It provides sellers and consumers with cutting-edge marketplace technology, targeting a rapidly growing region of over 500 million people. By building an in
Thomson Reuters
Thomson Reuters (TSX/NDAQ: TRI) informs the way forward by bringing together the trusted content and technology that people and organizations need to make the right decisions. We serve professionals across legal, tax, accounting, compliance, government, and media. Our products combine highly special
Juniper Networks
Juniper Networks is leading the revolution in networking, making it one of the most exciting technology companies in Silicon Valley today. Since being founded by Pradeep Sindhu, Dennis Ferguson, and Bjorn Liencres nearly 20 years ago, Juniper’s sole mission has been to create innovative products and
Rakuten Group, Inc. (TSE: 4755) is a global technology leader in services that empower individuals, communities, businesses and society. Founded in Tokyo in 1997 as an online marketplace, Rakuten has expanded to offer services in e-commerce, fintech, digital content and communications to 2 billion m
Bosch Global Software Technologies
With our unique ability to offer end-to-end solutions that connect the three pillars of IoT - Sensors, Software, and Services, we enable businesses to move from the traditional to the digital, or improve businesses by introducing a digital element in their products and processes. Now more than ever
.png)
Docker, Inc CyberSecurity News
December 29, 2025 08:26 PM
SBOMs in 2026: Some Love, Some Hate, Much Ambivalence
With a new year upon us, software security experts disagree on SBOM utility — in theory, SBOMs are great, but in practice, they're a mess.
December 17, 2025 08:00 AM
Flare Finds 10,000 Docker Hub Images Exposing Secrets
The exposed secrets found in a 30-day scan in November came from more than 100 firms, including a Fortune 500 company and a major bank.
December 17, 2025 08:00 AM
Docker, Inc. Adds More Than a Thousand Free Hardened Container Images
Docker is releasing more than 1000 hardened container images under an open source license, aiming to strengthen software supply chains.
November 16, 2025 08:00 AM
OWASP Releases: CheatSheet – A Practical Guide for Securely Using Third-Party MCP Servers
November 11, 2025 08:00 AM
Top 40 Cyber Security Projects to Boost Your Skills (2026)
Top Cyber Security Projects: 1. Cybersecurity Incident Response Simulation Tool 2. Biometric Authentication System 3.
November 10, 2025 08:00 AM
runC Docker threats, lost iPhone scam, Landfall spyware warning
October 16, 2025 07:00 AM
UM-Flint professors awarded $300K NSF grant for implementing cloud-based AI labs
Two UM-Flint computer science professors have secured a $300K NSF grant to broaden student access to cybersecurity education.
September 08, 2025 07:00 AM
AI Malware Strikes: “s1ngularity” Attack Hijacks 2000+ GitHub Accounts
September 01, 2025 07:00 AM
⚡ Weekly Recap: WhatsApp 0-Day, Docker Bug, Salesforce Breach, Fake CAPTCHAs, Spyware App & More
Here's this week's cybersecurity recap in plain terms, built for leaders and practitioners who need the signal, not the noise.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Docker, Inc CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Docker, Inc
The official website of Docker, Inc is http://www.docker.com.
Docker, Inc’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Docker, Inc’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 769, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Docker, Inc’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Docker, Inc currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Docker, Inc been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Docker, Inc has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does Docker, Inc have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Docker, Inc is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Docker, Inc have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Docker, Inc does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Docker, Inc comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Docker, Inc is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Docker, Inc have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Docker, Inc does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Docker, Inc comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Docker, Inc is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Docker, Inc have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Docker, Inc is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Docker, Inc
Docker, Inc operates primarily in the Software Development industry.
Number of Employees at Docker, Inc
Docker, Inc employs approximately 949 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Docker, Inc
Docker, Inc presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Docker, Inc’s LinkedIn Followers
Docker, Inc’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 759,100 followers.
NAICS Classification of Docker, Inc
Docker, Inc is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.
Docker, Inc’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Docker, Inc does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Docker, Inc’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Docker, Inc maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/docker.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Docker, Inc
As of January 21, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Docker, Inc has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Docker, Inc has an estimated 28,123 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Docker, Inc ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability.
How does Docker, Inc detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with imperva (researcher ron masas), third party assistance with enisa (for dll hijacking disclosure), and containment measures with patches released (compose v2.40.2, desktop 4.49.0)., and remediation measures with sanitize all file paths in oci artifact processing (compose)., remediation measures with secure dll search order in windows installer (desktop)., and recovery measures with users urged to upgrade immediately., and communication strategy with public advisories via nist, enisa, and vendor release notes...
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Critical Path Traversal and DLL Hijacking Vulnerabilities in Docker Compose and Docker Desktop
Description: Docker Compose users are being strongly urged to upgrade their versions of the orchestration tool after a researcher uncovered a flaw (CVE-2025-62725, severity 8.9) that could allow attackers to stage path traversal attacks by escaping Compose's cache directory and writing arbitrary files on the host system. The vulnerability was found in the tool's support for OCI-based Compose artifacts, where Compose trusted layer annotations without proper path sanitization. Additionally, Docker fixed a DLL hijacking vulnerability (EUVD-2025-36191, severity 8.8) in its Windows Installer (Desktop Installer.exe), which allowed attackers to gain higher-level system access by placing malicious DLLs in the Downloads folder. Both flaws have been patched in Docker Compose v2.40.2 and Docker Desktop 4.49.0, respectively.
Date Detected: 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
Type: Vulnerability
Attack Vector: NetworkLocal (DLL Hijacking)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Malicious OCI-based Compose artifact (path traversal)Malicious DLL in Downloads folder (DLL hijacking).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Systems Affected: Docker Compose (OCI artifact processing)Docker Desktop (Windows Installer)
Operational Impact: Potential arbitrary file writes on host systems (Compose) or privilege escalation via DLL hijacking (Desktop).
Brand Reputation Impact: Moderate (repeated high-severity vulnerabilities in Docker products may erode trust).
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Entity Name: Docker, Inc.
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Software/Cloud Computing
Location: Global
Customers Affected: Millions (users of Docker Compose and Docker Desktop)
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Imperva (Researcher Ron Masas), Enisa (For Dll Hijacking Disclosure).
Containment Measures: Patches released (Compose v2.40.2, Desktop 4.49.0).
Remediation Measures: Sanitize all file paths in OCI artifact processing (Compose).Secure DLL search order in Windows Installer (Desktop).
Recovery Measures: Users urged to upgrade immediately.
Communication Strategy: Public advisories via NIST, ENISA, and vendor release notes.
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Imperva (researcher Ron Masas), ENISA (for DLL hijacking disclosure), .
Data Breach Information
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Sanitize all file paths in OCI artifact processing (Compose)., Secure DLL search order in Windows Installer (Desktop)., .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by patches released (compose v2.40.2, desktop 4.49.0). and .
Ransomware Information
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Users urged to upgrade immediately., .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Regulatory Notifications: NIST (CVE-2025-62725)ENISA (EUVD-2025-36191)
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Lessons Learned: Sanitize all file paths, even in seemingly safe formats like YAML., Secure DLL search order to prevent hijacking., Regular updates are critical (aligns with OWASP's Docker security rule: 'Keep Host and Docker up to date').
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Recommendations: Upgrade Docker Compose to v2.40.2 or later., Upgrade Docker Desktop to 4.49.0 or later (note: future versions require Windows 10 22H2/Windows 11 23H2)., Avoid downloading/untrusted DLLs in system paths., Monitor for unauthorized file writes or privilege escalations.Upgrade Docker Compose to v2.40.2 or later., Upgrade Docker Desktop to 4.49.0 or later (note: future versions require Windows 10 22H2/Windows 11 23H2)., Avoid downloading/untrusted DLLs in system paths., Monitor for unauthorized file writes or privilege escalations.Upgrade Docker Compose to v2.40.2 or later., Upgrade Docker Desktop to 4.49.0 or later (note: future versions require Windows 10 22H2/Windows 11 23H2)., Avoid downloading/untrusted DLLs in system paths., Monitor for unauthorized file writes or privilege escalations.Upgrade Docker Compose to v2.40.2 or later., Upgrade Docker Desktop to 4.49.0 or later (note: future versions require Windows 10 22H2/Windows 11 23H2)., Avoid downloading/untrusted DLLs in system paths., Monitor for unauthorized file writes or privilege escalations.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Sanitize all file paths, even in seemingly safe formats like YAML.,Secure DLL search order to prevent hijacking.,Regular updates are critical (aligns with OWASP's Docker security rule: 'Keep Host and Docker up to date').
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Source: Imperva Research (Ron Masas)
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Source: NIST NVD (CVE-2025-62725)
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Source: ENISA (EUVD-2025-36191)
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Source: Docker Release Notes (v2.40.2, 4.49.0)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Imperva Research (Ron Masas), and Source: NIST NVD (CVE-2025-62725), and Source: ENISA (EUVD-2025-36191), and Source: Docker Release Notes (v2.40.2, 4.49.0).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Investigation Status: Resolved (patches released)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Advisories Via Nist, Enisa and And Vendor Release Notes..
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Stakeholder Advisories: Nist, Enisa, Docker Release Notes.
Customer Advisories: Public urging to upgrade immediately
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Nist, Enisa, Docker Release Notes, Public Urging To Upgrade Immediately and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Entry Point: Malicious Oci-Based Compose Artifact (Path Traversal), Malicious Dll In Downloads Folder (Dll Hijacking),
High Value Targets: Host System Files (Compose), Privileged System Access (Desktop),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Host System Files (Compose), Privileged System Access (Desktop),
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability DOC2992329103025
Root Causes: Lack Of Path Sanitization In Oci Artifact Processing (Compose)., Insecure Dll Search Order In Windows Installer (Desktop).,
Corrective Actions: Path Normalization/Canonicalization In Compose., Secured Dll Search Order In Desktop Installer.,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Imperva (Researcher Ron Masas), Enisa (For Dll Hijacking Disclosure), .
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Path Normalization/Canonicalization In Compose., Secured Dll Search Order In Desktop Installer., .
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Docker Compose (OCI artifact processing)Docker Desktop (Windows Installer).
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was imperva (researcher ron masas), enisa (for dll hijacking disclosure), .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Patches released (Compose v2.40.2 and Desktop 4.49.0)..
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Regular updates are critical (aligns with OWASP's Docker security rule: 'Keep Host and Docker up to date').
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Upgrade Docker Desktop to 4.49.0 or later (note: future versions require Windows 10 22H2/Windows 11 23H2)., Avoid downloading/untrusted DLLs in system paths., Monitor for unauthorized file writes or privilege escalations. and Upgrade Docker Compose to v2.40.2 or later..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Imperva Research (Ron Masas), ENISA (EUVD-2025-36191), NIST NVD (CVE-2025-62725), Docker Release Notes (v2.40.2 and 4.49.0).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Resolved (patches released).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was NIST, ENISA, Docker release notes, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Public urging to upgrade immediately.
Initial Access Broker
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=docker' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
