Comparison Overview
DNA Communications

DNA Communications
601 First Ave, Rochelle, IL, US, 61068
Last Update: 29/06/2026
We’re going on 21 great years of service, dedicated to serving North-Central Illinois rural communities, with the highest quality Digital Telecommunication Services, Fiber Optics, DSL, ADSL, VDSL, SIP Trunking, without the high costs. Our Headquarters is in Rochelle Ill...

Cox Communications
6205 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Atlanta, 30328, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Cox Communications is committed to creating more moments of real human connection. We bring people closer to family and friends through technology that’s inspired by a culture that puts people first, and we’re always working to improve life in the communities we serve. ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

DNA Communications







Cox Communications






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
DNA Communications has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2026.
Incident History - DNA Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DNA Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cox Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cox Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

DNA Communications

Cox Communications
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.