Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » DMDC » UNIDMD1790663075

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (UNIDMD1790663075)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-289
Company Score Before Incident753 / 1000
Company Score After Incident464 / 1000
Company LinkView DMDC Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERUNIDMD1790663075
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORVulnerability in file-sharing system
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information, Social Security numbers,...
INCIDENT DATE30/09/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of DMDC's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts DMDC Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the DMDC breach identified under incident ID UNIDMD1790663075.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of DMDC's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dmdc, the number of followers: 1074, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 195 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 464 with a difference of -289 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on DMDC and their customers.

On 18 September 2026, U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) - Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Pentagon Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Records of Over 3 Million Individuals".

The U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) file-sharing system, and exposing Personal information, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, names, contact details, demographic information, military occupational specialty records, with nearly 3.05 million records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Patched the vulnerability, and began remediation that includes Initiated incident-response protocols, offered credit monitoring and identity-restoration services, and stakeholders are being briefed through Breach notifications sent to affected individuals on September 18, 2026.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Vulnerabilities in data encryption, access controls, and monitoring practices within high-value defense systems need to be addressed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Breach notifications sent to affected individuals on September 18, 2026, with offers of free credit monitoring and identity-restoration services.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating vulnerability in a file-sharing system allowed unauthorized external access. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unencrypted files containing SSNs, military records accessed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, dates of birth, names, contact details compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating dMDC manages over 60 million personnel records for military, veterans. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating investigators are assessing whether the intruders exfiltrated the data and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating file-sharing system vulnerability allowed external access. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating lack of encryption, inadequate access controls highlighted and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating unencrypted files were accessed, no obfuscation detected. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating exposure of military job data raises counterintelligence concerns and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but long-term identity theft risks. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (40%)
Obfuscated Files or Information (30%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (50%)
Data Destruction (20%)

Sources & References