What is the official website of DLA Piper Poland ?

The official website of DLA Piper Poland is https://www.dlapiper.com/en/poland/.

What is DLA Piper Poland's cybersecurity risk score?

DLA Piper Poland has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 751 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has DLA Piper Poland experienced?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Poland currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has DLA Piper Poland been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Poland has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does DLA Piper Poland have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Poland is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does DLA Piper Poland have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Poland does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does DLA Piper Poland comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Poland is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does DLA Piper Poland have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Poland does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does DLA Piper Poland comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Poland is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does DLA Piper Poland have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,DLA Piper Poland is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does DLA Piper Poland operate in ?

DLA Piper Poland operates primarily in the Praktyki prawnicze industry.

How many employees does DLA Piper Poland have ?

DLA Piper Poland employs approximately 1 people worldwide.

Does DLA Piper Poland own any subsidiaries ?

DLA Piper Poland presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does DLA Piper Poland have ?

DLA Piper Poland's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 7,252 followers.

Does DLA Piper Poland have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, DLA Piper Poland does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does DLA Piper Poland have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, DLA Piper Poland maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dla-piper-poland-warsaw.

How many cybersecurity incidents has DLA Piper Poland experienced ?

As of October 15, 2026, Rankiteo reports that DLA Piper Poland has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does DLA Piper Poland have ?

DLA Piper Poland has an estimated 0 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

DPP

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

751

/1000

Fair

776

/1000

Fair

DLA Piper Poland Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

dlapiper.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

DLA Piper jest globalną kancelarią prawną zatrudniającą 4200 prawników w ponad 40 krajach Europy, Bliskiego Wschodu, regionu Azji i Pacyfiku oraz obu Ameryk. Kancelaria DLA Piper w Polsce świadczy usługi doradztwa prawnego i podatkowego na rzecz międzynarodowych korporacji, instytucji finansowych oraz przedsiębiorstw krajowych prowadzących działalność we wszystkich sektorach gospodarki, poprzez następujące specjalistyczne działy prawne: - Prawo korporacyjne, transakcje fuzji i przejęć, rynki kapitałowe, private equity - Rynki finansowe i projekty infrastrukturalne - Doradztwo regulacyjne, w tym prawo energetyczne i life science - Postępowania sądowe i arbitrażowe - Prawo podatkowe - Własność intelektualna i technologie - Prawo pracy -

DPP

DLA Piper Poland CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

DPP Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for DPP

Incidents vs Praktyki prawnicze Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper Poland in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper Poland in 2026.

Incident Types DPP vs Praktyki prawnicze Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper Poland in 2026.

Incident History - DPP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

DLA Piper Poland Subsidiaries

DPP

Praktyki prawnicze

Website: https://www.dlapiper.com/en/poland/

Company Size: 1

DLA PiperLaw Practice

DLA Piper in Latin AmericaLegal Services

DLA Piper Israel GroupLegal Services

DLA Piper Energy and Natural Resources SectorLegal Services

DLA Piper in LuxembourgLegal Services

Loading…

DLA Piper Poland Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

DLA Piper Poland CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 27, 2026 08:00 AM

EU Data Breach Notifications Surge as GDPR Changes Loom

EU data breach notifications have surged 22% in the last year and GDPR fines remain high, according to a new report from law firm DLA Piper.

Read Article

January 22, 2026 08:00 AM

Over 160,000 Companies Notify Regulators of GDPR Breaches

DLA Piper finds 22% increase in breached firms notifying European GDPR regulators.

Read Article

August 28, 2025 07:00 AM

How NIS2 puts executives in the firing line for cybersecurity

NIS2 puts executives in the firing line by expanding management's cybersecurity oversight duties. They face personal liability and potential...

Read Article

June 27, 2024 07:00 AM

SEC adopts cyber amendments to Regulation S-P: Top points

These amendments mandate covered institutions to develop an incident response program, establish security policies addressing vendor risk,...

Read Article

February 15, 2024 11:35 AM

Transfer - global data transfer methodology

This creates an increased reliance on international supply chains and intra-group data sharing, with many cloud vendors based in the US and other third...

Read Article

January 29, 2024 10:54 PM

AI ChatRoom

Exploring the transformative power of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on today's businesses. DLA Piper presents AI ChatRoom, a captivating series of...

Read Article

September 02, 2023 03:50 PM

Compliance Films

DLA Piper has created four fictional corporate dramas to address real-world legal and regulatory issues that may arise when responding to allegations of...

Read Article

June 28, 2017 07:00 AM

Ukraine, Russia, Poland Still Grappling With Major New Ransomware Attack

Companies across the world are still grappling with the effects of a major new ransomware cyberattack that struck their computer systems,...

Read Article

March 17, 2017 07:00 AM

'Anonymous' Joins Hacker Army Targeting Central Banks for Cash

In 2008, a group of thieves stole $700000 from Russia's central bank the old-fashioned way: they infiltrated a processing center,...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-110873

SUMMARY

Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.

Published

Date2026-10-14

Updated

Date2026-10-14

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

4.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-110872

SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

Published

Date2026-10-14

Updated

Date2026-10-14

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-110871

SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

Published

Date2026-10-14

Updated

Date2026-10-14

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-110870

SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

Published

Date2026-10-14

Updated

Date2026-10-14

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-110869

SUMMARY

Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

Published

Date2026-10-14

Updated

Date2026-10-14

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

DLA Piper Poland Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

DPP A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

DLA Piper Poland CyberSecurity News & History

DPP Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for DPP

Incidents vs Praktyki prawnicze Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types DPP vs Praktyki prawnicze Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - DPP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLA Piper Poland Subsidiaries

DPP

DLA Piper Poland Similar Companies

DLA Piper Poland CyberSecurity News

EU Data Breach Notifications Surge as GDPR Changes Loom

Over 160,000 Companies Notify Regulators of GDPR Breaches

How NIS2 puts executives in the firing line for cybersecurity

SEC adopts cyber amendments to Regulation S-P: Top points

Transfer - global data transfer methodology

AI ChatRoom

Compliance Films

Ukraine, Russia, Poland Still Grappling With Major New Ransomware Attack

'Anonymous' Joins Hacker Army Targeting Central Banks for Cash

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

DLA Piper Poland CyberSecurity News & History

DPP Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for DPP

Incidents vs Praktyki prawnicze Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types DPP vs Praktyki prawnicze Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - DPP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLA Piper Poland Subsidiaries

DPP

DLA Piper Poland Similar Companies

DLA Piper Poland CyberSecurity News

EU Data Breach Notifications Surge as GDPR Changes Loom

Over 160,000 Companies Notify Regulators of GDPR Breaches

How NIS2 puts executives in the firing line for cybersecurity

SEC adopts cyber amendments to Regulation S-P: Top points

Transfer - global data transfer methodology

AI ChatRoom

Compliance Films

Ukraine, Russia, Poland Still Grappling With Major New Ransomware Attack

'Anonymous' Joins Hacker Army Targeting Central Banks for Cash

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo