What is the official website of DLA Piper Financial Services Sector ?

The official website of DLA Piper Financial Services Sector is https://www.dlapiper.com/sectors/financial-services/.

What is DLA Piper Financial Services Sector's cybersecurity risk score?

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 753 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has DLA Piper Financial Services Sector experienced?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Financial Services Sector currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has DLA Piper Financial Services Sector been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Financial Services Sector has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Financial Services Sector is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Financial Services Sector does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Financial Services Sector is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Financial Services Sector does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, DLA Piper Financial Services Sector is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,DLA Piper Financial Services Sector is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector operate in ?

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector operates primarily in the Legal Services industry.

How many employees does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector have ?

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector own any subsidiaries ?

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector have ?

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 3,640 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for DLA Piper Financial Services Sector ?

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector is classified under the NAICS code 5411, which corresponds to Legal Services.

Does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, DLA Piper Financial Services Sector does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, DLA Piper Financial Services Sector maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dla-piper-financial-services-sector.

How many cybersecurity incidents has DLA Piper Financial Services Sector experienced ?

As of June 6, 2026, Rankiteo reports that DLA Piper Financial Services Sector has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does DLA Piper Financial Services Sector have ?

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector has an estimated 7,869 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

DPFSS

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

753

/1000

Fair

778

/1000

Fair

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

dlapiper.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

DLA Piper advises some of the largest financial services companies and institutions on both their day-to-day operations and strategic objectives.

DPFSS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

DPFSS

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

DPFSS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for DPFSS

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper Financial Services Sector in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper Financial Services Sector in 2026.

Incident Types DPFSS vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper Financial Services Sector in 2026.

Incident History - DPFSS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector Subsidiaries

DPFSS

Legal Services

Website: https://www.dlapiper.com/sectors/financial-services/

Company Size: None employees

DLA PiperLaw Practice

DLA Piper in Latin AmericaLegal Services

DLA Piper in LuxembourgLegal Services

DLA Piper Technology SectorLegal Services

DLA Piper RomaniaLegal Services

Loading…

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

DLA Piper Financial Services Sector CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-7654

SUMMARY

The Admin Columns plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection leading to Remote Code Execution in versions up to and including 7.0.18. This is due to the use of `unserialize()` without an `allowed_classes` restriction in the `IdsToCollection::get_ids_from_string()` function, which processes attacker-controlled post meta values without proper validation. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access and above to inject a serialized PHP object into a post's custom meta field and trigger arbitrary code execution by exploiting a bundled POP gadget chain, resulting in remote code execution as the web server user.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7523

SUMMARY

The Alba Board plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.3. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to access arbitrary private alba_card post data, including title, description, assignee, due date, tags, and comments, that is intended to be restricted to Administrators and Editors. The handler is registered via the wp_ajax_nopriv_ hook and its nonce is exposed to all site visitors through wp_localize_script on pages containing the [alba_board] shortcode, making this exploitable by unauthenticated users who can access any such page.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-45409

SUMMARY

Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) for Python provides support for Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) and Unicode IDNA Compatibility Processing. In versions prior to 3.15, payloads such as `"\u0660" * N` or `"\u30fb" * N + "\u6f22"` utilize the `valid_contexto` function prior to length rejection, and for high values of `N` will take a long time to process. This is the same issue as CVE-2024-3651, however the original remediation in 2024 was not a complete fix. A specially crafted argument to the `idna.encode()` function could consume significant resources. This may lead to a denial-of-service. Starting in version 3.14, the function rejects long inputs as soon as practicable prior to any further processing to minimize resource consumption. In version 3.15, this approach was extended to lesser used alternate functions (i.e. per-label conversions and codec support). A workaround is available. Domain names cannot exceed 253 characters in length. If this length limit is enforced prior to passing the domain to the `idna.encode()` function, it should no longer consume significant resources. This is triggered by arbitrarily large inputs that would not occur in normal usage, but may be passed to the library assuming there is no preliminary input validation by the higher-level application.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/kjd/idna/security/advisories/GHSA-65pc-fj4g-8rjx

CVE-2026-11431

SUMMARY

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the Projects Service download endpoint shared by Altium Enterprise Server and Altium 365. An authenticated user can supply a crafted path parameter that bypasses validation, allowing arbitrary files (including entire directories returned as archives) to be read from the server filesystem. Because the readable files include service configuration and credential material, exploitation can be used to gather information enabling further compromise. The issue can be combined with CVE-2026-11424 to reach the cloud-side endpoint. On multi-tenant Altium 365 deployments, the readable configuration could have exposed credentials shared across services. Altium Enterprise Server is fixed in 8.1.1; the issue has been remediated in Altium 365 at the service level.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.altium.com/platform/security-compliance/security-advisories

CVE-2026-11429

SUMMARY

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the Git Service component shared by Altium Enterprise Server and Altium 365. The service accepts a sequence of post-clone file-manipulation operations that use user-supplied paths without validation, allowing an authenticated user with basic git access to move arbitrary files outside the intended repository area. This file-move primitive can be used to place attacker-controlled script content into directories where it is later executed by the service, resulting in remote code execution under the Git Service account. On multi-tenant Altium 365 deployments, this could have allowed access to data belonging to other tenants on the same infrastructure node. Altium Enterprise Server is fixed in 8.1.1; the issue has been remediated in Altium 365 at the service level.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.altium.com/platform/security-compliance/security-advisories

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…