What is the official website of DIRECTV ?

The official website of DIRECTV is http://direc.tv/about.

What is DIRECTV's cybersecurity risk score?

DIRECTV has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 780 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has DIRECTV experienced?

According to Rankiteo, DIRECTV currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has DIRECTV been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, DIRECTV has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does DIRECTV have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DIRECTV is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does DIRECTV have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DIRECTV does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does DIRECTV comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, DIRECTV is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does DIRECTV have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, DIRECTV does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does DIRECTV comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, DIRECTV is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does DIRECTV have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,DIRECTV is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does DIRECTV operate in ?

DIRECTV operates primarily in the Entertainment industry.

How many employees does DIRECTV have ?

DIRECTV employs approximately 15,237 people worldwide.

Does DIRECTV own any subsidiaries ?

DIRECTV presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does DIRECTV have ?

DIRECTV's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 174,076 followers.

Does DIRECTV have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, DIRECTV does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does DIRECTV have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, DIRECTV maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/directv.

How many cybersecurity incidents has DIRECTV experienced ?

As of August 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that DIRECTV has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does DIRECTV have ?

DIRECTV has an estimated 2,198 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

DIRECTV

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

780

/1000

Fair

805

/1000

Good

DIRECTV Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

direc.tv

Add Your Compliance Badge

At DIRECTV, we believe TV is meant to be enjoyed. Everything we do is focused on delivering an entertainment experience above and beyond expectations and industry standards and advocating for excellence on behalf of our customers. A shared passion for the joy of television defines our mission to offer the content, service, and reliability that allows our customers to connect, unwind, and indulge their inner superfan by watching what they love on any screen, anywhere.    We never stop innovating and continue to embrace emerging technologies. We’re constantly evolving our products, including best-in-class content and personalized services to provide our customers with industry-leading video offerings.    Learn more about our

DIRECTV A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

DIRECTV

DIRECTV CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

DIRECTV Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for DIRECTV

Incidents vs Entertainment Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DIRECTV in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DIRECTV in 2026.

Incident Types DIRECTV vs Entertainment Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DIRECTV in 2026.

Incident History - DIRECTV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

DIRECTV Subsidiaries

Parent Company

DIRECTV

Entertainment

Website: http://direc.tv/about

Company Size: 10,001+ employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

DIRECTV Similar Companies

Cinépolis

cinepolis.com

Leading global entertainment company born in Latin America, with over 6,000 screens, 3rd largest in the world. Cinépolis has operations in Mexico, Central and South America, Asia, Spain, India and United States of America. With more than 40k cinepolites delivering the "Cinepolis" experience based in the vision of "Illuminating your life movie with smiles & unforgettable moments". #youarethestar

Loading…

NEWS

DIRECTV CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

December 16, 2025 08:00 AM

DirecTV: Plan to Boost Starlink Speeds Risks Disrupting Our Satellite TV Service

Satellite companies are fighting again via FCC filings. Another satellite operator, SES, also says interference from Starlink satellites...

Read Article

November 15, 2025 08:00 AM

DirecTV Prepares to Expand Into Free Online Streaming

'MyFree DIRECTV' launches on Nov. 15 and will be available on the web, mobile, and select smart TVs. But you'll need to watch a few ads.

Read Article

April 23, 2025 07:00 AM

AT&T Delivers Strong First-Quarter Financial Performance

Our first-quarter results reiterate 2025 full-year financial & operational guidance, & our growth with profitable 5G & fiber subscriber...

Read Article

March 28, 2025 07:00 AM

DIRECTV Joins IBCAP to Combat Piracy of American Content

The International Broadcaster Coalition Against Piracy (IBCAP) announced the addition of DIRECTV, a leading video distribution company in the US, as its newest...

Read Article

March 07, 2025 08:00 AM

People Moves: Fazal Merchant

Cybersecurity and cloud startup Wiz has announced the appointment of Fazal Merchant as its new President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO).

Read Article

January 27, 2025 08:00 AM

AT&T Finishes 2024 Strong with Solid 4Q Results

Our fourth-quarter & full-year results showcased 5G & fiber momentum with growth in service revenues, cash from operations, & free cash...

Read Article

January 09, 2025 08:00 AM

Cybersecurity Giant Wiz Taps Fazal Merchant as President & CFO to Lead IPO and Billion-Dollar Growth Drive

Fazal Merchant has been appointed as the President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of Wiz, a leading cloud and AI security vendor.

Read Article

January 09, 2025 08:00 AM

Wiz appoints CFO with IPO on the horizon

Fazal Merchant has been named CFO and president of the cybersecurity company, which last July declined a $23 billion acquisition offer from Google.

Read Article

September 30, 2024 07:00 AM

AT&T sells 70% stake in DirecTV to private equity firm TPG for $7.6 bn

AT&T would receive an initial payment of $2 billion in 2025, and additional payments through 2029, the company said in a filing on Monday.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-18556

SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects N-central: through 2026.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://uptime.n-able.com/

CVE-2026-55735

SUMMARY

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token. Guardian.revoke/3 in lib/guardian.ex decodes the supplied token with peek/1, which performs no signature verification (it only base64-decodes the JWT header and payload). The resulting unverified claims are forwarded directly to the configured token module's revoke callback and the implementation's on_revoke callback, a state-mutating sink. The sibling operations refresh/2 and exchange/4 both call decode_and_verify first, so the signature is checked before anything acts on the claims; revoke/3 is the only state-mutating path that acts on claims without verifying the signature. An attacker who knows or guesses a victim's identifying claim values (jti, sub) can forge a JWT carrying those claims, sign it with an arbitrary key, and submit it to any endpoint that funnels a caller-supplied token into Guardian.revoke/3 (the standard logout / session-revocation pattern). When the token module mutates state keyed by the claims (whitelist deletion or blacklist insertion, for example a GuardianDb-style store), the victim's legitimate session is evicted. This is an unauthenticated session-revocation denial of service; the attacker never needs the signing secret. This issue affects guardian: from 1.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55734

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in ueberauth guardian (Guardian.Permissions module) allows a denial of service via BEAM atom-table exhaustion. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/guardian/permissions.ex and program routines 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions!/1, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions_into_claims!/2, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':do_encode_permissions!/2. The Guardian.Permissions mixin installs a public encode_permissions!/1 function on every module that does use Guardian.Permissions. For each key of the supplied map, encode_permissions!/1 calls String.to_atom(to_string(k)) before any validation runs. The integer-value clause of do_encode_permissions!/2 then short-circuits straight to encoding without validating the key against the configured permission set, so a key with an integer value is interned as a fresh atom with no exception raised. Atoms are never garbage collected and the BEAM atom table is a fixed-size resource (default roughly 1,048,576 entries), so each unique attacker-chosen key permanently consumes one slot. An attacker who can influence a permission map that reaches encode_permissions!/1 (for example a permissions map read from a request body and passed into token issuance via encode_permissions_into_claims!/2) can mint an unbounded number of atoms and exhaust the atom table, crashing the entire BEAM node and every service running on it. The sibling decode_permissions/1 is not affected because it skips keys absent from the configured permission set. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55733

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-controlled binary input. Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding encodes permission scopes by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. When encode/3 in lib/guardian/permissions/atom_encoding.ex is called with a list, each binary entry is handled by the encode_value/3 binary clause, which calls String.to_atom(value) with no allow-list check. The perm_set argument (the application's small, finite set of legitimate permission names) is discarded, so any external string flows straight into atom creation. This encoder is selected with use Guardian.Permissions, encoding: Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding and reached through the imported encode/3 entry point. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that funnels attacker-influenced permission scopes (from a request body, a JWT claim, or other external input) into encode/3 therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node with system_limit, taking down every application running on it. The default encoder is Guardian.Permissions.BitwiseEncoding, which is not affected. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-54894

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-influenced binary input. Guardian.Plug.Keys derives connection and session namespace keys by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. base_key/1 in lib/guardian/plug/keys.ex converts any binary into the atom :"guardian_<input>", and the derived helpers claims_key/1, resource_key/1, and token_key/1 create a second atom on top of that. key_from_other/1 likewise converts a regex-captured binary through String.to_atom/1. The public specs advertise String.t() as a valid argument, so passing a string is documented usage, and higher-level entry points such as Guardian.Plug.current_token(conn, key: key) thread the caller-supplied key straight into these functions. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that routes attacker-influenced data (a tenant identifier, header, or other request input) into a Guardian key therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node, taking down every application running on it. This issue affects guardian: from 0.1.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…