Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DIR1770028271)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) breach identified under incident ID DIR1770028271.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM)'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/direction-interministerielle-du-numerique-dinum, the number of followers: 68225, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 298 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 763 and after the incident was 664 with a difference of -99 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) and their customers.
On 16 January 2024, Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Cyberattaque contre HubEE : 160 000 documents administratifs français exposés".
Le 16 janvier, la Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) a confirmé une cyberintrusion sur HubEE, sa plateforme d’échange de documents administratifs, détectée le 9 janvier.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting HubEE platform, and exposing 160,000 documents (70,000 dossiers), with nearly 160,000 documents (70,000 dossiers) records at risk.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Blocked attacker access, platform taken offline temporarily, and began remediation that includes Password reset, mandatory two-factor authentication for admin accounts, while recovery efforts such as Platform restored on 2024-01-12 continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure, user advisories via [email protected].
The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Need for enhanced security protocols in government digital platforms, persistent vulnerabilities in public infrastructure, and recommending next steps like Strengthen authentication measures, improve monitoring for data leaks, increase user awareness of phishing risks, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Government agencies collaborating to inform affected users.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating cyberintrusion sur HubEE, sa plateforme d’échange de documents administratifs and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating réinitialisation générale des mots de passe imposée post-incident. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating renforcement des protocoles de sécurité, authentification à double facteur obligatoire and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating accès aux attaquants bloqué, comptes administrateurs ciblés. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 160 000 documents contenant des données sensibles d’usagers exfiltrés and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 70 000 dossiers administratifs volés via HubEE. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attaquants ont exfiltré 160 000 documents sensibles and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating données sensibles récupérées par les pirates (implied exfiltration). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating plateforme temporairement mise hors ligne pour renforcement sécurité and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating accès bloqué post-détection, comptes administrateurs ciblés. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating pas de détails sur l’état des données post-exfiltration and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating risques de phishing ou usurpation d’identité pour les usagers. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/direction-interministerielle-du-numerique-dinum/incident/DIR1770028271
- Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/direction-interministerielle-du-numerique-dinum
- Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/dir1770028271-direction-gnrale-de-la-cohsion-sociale-direction-interministrielle-du-numrique-direction-de-linformation-lgale-et-administrative-direction-g-breach-january-2026/
- Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/direction-interministerielle-du-numerique-dinum/history
- Direction interministérielle du numérique (DINUM) CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.clubic.com/actualite-595606-l-etat-confirme-la-cyberattaque-160-000-documents-contenant-des-donnees-sensibles-recuperees-par-les-pirates.html
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf