Comparison Overview
Dilworth Hearing

Dilworth Hearing
undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, NZ
Last Update: 01/03/2026
Dilworth Hearing was established in 1960 by an ambitious team of ENT specialists who have worked tirelessly over the past 50 years to forge the company’s position in the audiology industry. Here at Dilworth Hearing, we work to provide the most advanced hearing aid techn...

SSM Health
10101 Woodfield Ln, St Louis, 63132, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
SSM Health is a Catholic, not-for-profit, fully integrated health system dedicated to advancing innovative, sustainable, and compassionate care for patients and communities throughout the Midwest and beyond. The organization’s 40,000 team members and 13,900 providers ar...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Dilworth Hearing







SSM Health






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dilworth Hearing in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SSM Health in 2026.
Incident History - Dilworth Hearing (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dilworth Hearing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SSM Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SSM Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Dilworth Hearing

SSM Health
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.