Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Digital Mental Health Consortium » DIG1769432657

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DIG1769432657)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-95
Company Score Before Incident752 / 1000
Company Score After Incident657 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDIG1769432657
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive therapy records, full names,...
INCIDENT DATE30/09/2020
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Digital Mental Health Consortium's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Digital Mental Health Consortium Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Digital Mental Health Consortium breach identified under incident ID DIG1769432657.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Digital Mental Health Consortium's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/digitalmentalhealthconsortium, the number of followers: 2828, the industry type: Mental Health Care and the number of employees: 4 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 752 and after the incident was 657 with a difference of -95 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Digital Mental Health Consortium and their customers.

Vastaamo recently reported "Finnish Therapy Platform Vastaamo Hit by Massive Data Breach and Extortion Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

In October 2020, Finland-based therapy platform Vastaamo suffered a devastating cyberattack, exposing the sensitive records of tens of thousands of patients.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive therapy records, full names, social security numbers, unredacted therapy session notes, with nearly Tens of thousands records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Generic notification to victims, followed by extortion emails from attacker.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Critical failures in cybersecurity and victim support, particularly for mental health records. Breaches involving such data are uniquely damaging due to the trust and safety central to therapy. Lack of clear protocols for assisting victims exacerbated the harm, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Authorities initially advised victims not to overwhelm emergency services, leaving them to navigate the fallout alone.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attacker accessed full names, social security numbers, therapy notes and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating vastaamo suffered a devastating cyberattack. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unredacted therapy session notes were accessed and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social security numbers and full names compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive therapy records, full names, social security numbers accessed and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unredacted therapy session notes stolen. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed, tens of thousands of records exposed and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating leaked data remained accessible, fueling further scam attempts. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating extortion attack with ransom demands in Bitcoin and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating data published online after victims refused to pay. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attacker accessed therapy platforms internal records. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (40%)
Defacement (30%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services (50%)

Sources & References