Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » DigiGround » DIG1788157681

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DIG1788157681)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-113
Company Score Before Incident750 / 1000
Company Score After Incident637 / 1000
Company LinkView DigiGround Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERDIG1788157681
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE27/08/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of DigiGround's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts DigiGround Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the DigiGround breach identified under incident ID DIG1788157681.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of DigiGround's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/digiground, the number of followers: 1088, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 25 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 637 with a difference of -113 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on DigiGround and their customers.

On 28 August 2024, DigiGround disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Qilin Ransomware Group Targets Australian App Developer DigiGround".

The Qilin ransomware group has claimed a breach of DigiGround, a bespoke app development firm based in North Sydney, Australia.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement confirming investigation.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating bespoke app development firm...listed on darknet leak site and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating raaS model allows affiliates to use its infrastructure. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group has claimed another Australian victim. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating qilin ransomware group...listed on darknet leak site and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the organizations existence. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating qilin...allows affiliates to use its infrastructure. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of a breach as of yet and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating investigation remains a priority, no details beyond breach claim. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Data Destruction (30%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)

Sources & References