Comparison Overview

Diebold Nixdorf

VS

VOIS

Diebold Nixdorf

350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, Ohio, 44720, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

We automate, digitize and transform the way people bank and shop. We offer proven expertise and comprehensive portfolios in cutting-edge product technology, multi-vendor software and service excellence for financial and retail customers. Consumer behavior is changing rapidly; people are empowered and connected and expect unprecedented service and convenience. The world is “always on” – a digital era requiring us to orchestrate touchpoints in ways that meet and exceed the 24/7 automation needs of the banking and retail worlds. Diebold Nixdorf employs approximately 21,000 employees in more than 130 countries worldwide. We are publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “DBD.” Specialties: financial and retail self-service solutions, services, security solutions, software, cash management, branch and store transformation

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 19,828
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

VOIS

London, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-24

VOIS (Vodafone Intelligent Solutions) is a strategic arm of Vodafone Group Plc, creating value for customers by delivering intelligent solutions through Talent, Technology & Transformation. As the largest shared services organisation in the global telco industry, our portfolio of next-generation solutions and services are designed in partnership with customers across Vodafone Group, local markets, and partner markets to simplify and drive growth. We are pioneering a new Partnership model for the Telco industry, where the sharing of ideas, innovation, platforms and services will unlock opportunities for our people and value for our customers. With our strategic partner Accenture, we work alongside our Vodafone customers, other Telco and tech companies to drive transformation, meet the challenges of our industry and ensure we stay relevant and resilient. This partnership is a unique, industry-first model which brings together the best of in-house and 3rd party capability. We deliver value and results at scale by leveraging technology, data and our talented international team of 30K professionals in the following services: Technology, Business, B2B, Corporate Services, Customer Care. Our commercial model creates clear, benchmarked and competitively-priced services so that we can offer guaranteed outcomes for customers with flexibility and optionality. Bringing together our combined strengths with our strategic partner Accenture our strategy is to: Commercialise: Create cost transparency and foster trust and growth for our customers Re-platform: To simplify, streamline and scale our business Extend beyond our borders: deepening our relationships, growing our services and expanding our customer base across new customers & new geographies We work with customers across 28 countries from 10 VOIS locations: Albania, Egypt, Hungary, India, Romania, Spain, Turkey, UK, Germany, Ireland, and with a network of teams in Czech Republic, Italy, Greece, and Portugal.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 19,968
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diebold.jpeg
Diebold Nixdorf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vois.jpeg
VOIS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Diebold Nixdorf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VOIS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VOIS in 2025.

Incident History — Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VOIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VOIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diebold.jpeg
Diebold Nixdorf
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hard Drive Encryption Bypass
Motivation: Financial Data Breach, Unauthorized Cash Withdrawals
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vois.jpeg
VOIS
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Data Breach
Motivation: Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Data
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

VOIS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Diebold Nixdorf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VOIS company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Diebold Nixdorf company.

In the current year, VOIS company and Diebold Nixdorf company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both VOIS company and Diebold Nixdorf company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

VOIS company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Diebold Nixdorf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both VOIS company and Diebold Nixdorf company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Diebold Nixdorf company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while VOIS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf nor VOIS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VOIS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Diebold Nixdorf company.

VOIS company employs more people globally than Diebold Nixdorf company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf nor VOIS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf nor VOIS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf nor VOIS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf nor VOIS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf nor VOIS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf nor VOIS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H