Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DHL Express TaiwanDHL Express Taiwan
VS
CEVA LogisticsCEVA Logistics
DHL Express Taiwan

DHL Express Taiwan

No. 120, Sec. 2, Jianguo N. Rd., Taipei, Taiwan 10483, TW

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

【DHL – 全世界頂尖的物流公司】 DHL成立於1969年,隸屬於全球最大的郵遞和物流集團-德國郵政DHL (Deutsche Post DHL),是全球第一家提供國際快遞服務的供應商,更是全球國際快遞業的領導品牌。我們的業務遍佈全球,於全世界220多個國家和地區,提供可靠的緊急文件和貨品戶對戶快遞服務。 1973年DHL在台成立分支機構-DHL Express Taiwan洋基通運股份有限公司,為第一家進入台灣市場的國際快遞業者,並以多年的優質服務品質,成為市場佔有率最高的國際快遞公司。目前全台共有15個服務據點,超過1000名專...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:64
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CEVA Logistics

CEVA Logistics

10, Place de la Joliette, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur, FR, 13002

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cevalogistics.com
813/1000Good

CEVA provides world-class supply chain solutions for large and medium-size national and multinational companies across the globe. As an industry leader, CEVA offers customers complete supply chain design and implementation in contract logistics and freight management, a...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:64,968
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DHL Express Taiwan

DHL Express Taiwan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CEVA Logistics

CEVA Logistics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Express Taiwan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEVA Logistics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DHL Express Taiwan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Express Taiwan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CEVA Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEVA Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DHL Express Taiwan

DHL Express Taiwan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CEVA Logistics

CEVA Logistics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan and CEVA Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan and CEVA Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DHL Express Taiwan or CEVA Logistics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DHL Express Taiwan or CEVA Logistics ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan and CEVA Logistics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DHL Express Taiwan and CEVA Logistics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3