Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DHL Express JapanDHL Express Japan
VS
CEVA LogisticsCEVA Logistics
DHL Express Japan

DHL Express Japan

東品川1-37-8, 品川区, 東京都 1400002, JP

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

DHL Expressは、世界220以上の国と地域をスピーディーに結ぶエアネットワークを築き、国際エクスプレスのリーディングカンパニーとして、オンラインショッピングから企業の国際貿易まで、人々の生活やビジネスを国際輸送でサポートしています。 DHLジャパン株式会社について DHLジャパンは、DHLグループの日本支社として1972年にサービスを開始しました。 DHLジャパンは、Great Place To Work® Institute Japanが発表する、日本における「働きがいのある会社」ランキングにおいて、13年連続でベストカン...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:58
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CEVA Logistics

CEVA Logistics

10, Place de la Joliette, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur, FR, 13002

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cevalogistics.com
813/1000Good

CEVA provides world-class supply chain solutions for large and medium-size national and multinational companies across the globe. As an industry leader, CEVA offers customers complete supply chain design and implementation in contract logistics and freight management, a...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:64,968
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DHL Express Japan

DHL Express Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CEVA Logistics

CEVA Logistics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Express Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEVA Logistics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DHL Express Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Express Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CEVA Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEVA Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DHL Express Japan

DHL Express Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CEVA Logistics

CEVA Logistics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DHL Express Japan company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DHL Express Japan and CEVA Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DHL Express Japan and CEVA Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DHL Express Japan or CEVA Logistics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DHL Express Japan or CEVA Logistics ?
Between DHL Express Japan and CEVA Logistics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DHL Express Japan and CEVA Logistics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1