Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania)Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania)
VS
FirstsourceFirstsource
Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania)

Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania)

Splaiul Independentei 319G, Sema Parc, River House, 11th floor, Bucharest, 060032, RO

Last Update: 21/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://dtse.ro/
753/1000Fair

At Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania), we’ve been delivering essential support services for the Deutsche Telekom Group across Europe since 2013. Based in Bucharest and Timișoara, our Shared Service Center provides high-quality solutions in Human Res...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:272
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Firstsource

Firstsource

2nd, 3rd, 4th & 5th Floor, Paradigm B, Mindspace, Mumbai, 400064, IN

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.firstsource.com
790/1000Fair

Established in 2001, Firstsource Solutions Limited, an RP-Sanjiv Goenka Group company, is a specialized BPS partner with hyper-focused, domain-centered teams and cutting-edge tech, data, and analytics. We help our clients across healthcare, banking and financial servi...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:22,906
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania)

Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Firstsource

Firstsource

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Firstsource in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Firstsource (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Firstsource cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania)

Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Firstsource

Firstsource

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) company and Firstsource company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) and Firstsource, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) and Firstsource, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) or Firstsource ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) or Firstsource ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) and Firstsource, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Deutsche Telekom Services Europe Romania (DTSE Romania) and Firstsource, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2