Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Department for Migration and Globalisation » DEP1779892714

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DEP1779892714)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-104
Company Score Before Incident771 / 1000
Company Score After Incident667 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDEP1779892714
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORCompromised accounts
DATA EXPOSEDOver 600,000 records
INCIDENT DATE28/02/2026
STATUSOngoing (led by Prosecutor General’s Office)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Department for Migration and Globalisation's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Department for Migration and Globalisation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Department for Migration and Globalisation breach identified under incident ID DEP1779892714.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Department for Migration and Globalisation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/department-for-migration-and-globalisation, the number of followers: 2428, the industry type: Higher Education and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 771 and after the incident was 667 with a difference of -104 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Department for Migration and Globalisation and their customers.

Centre of Registers recently reported "Lithuania Data Breach Attributed to Hostile State Actors", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Lithuanian President Gitanas Nausėda attributed the theft of over 600,000 records from the Centre of Registers to hostile state actors, framing the March cyberattack as a national security threat.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Centre of Registers, Migration Department accounts, and exposing Over 600,000 records, with nearly 600,000+ records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Delayed public disclosure.

The case underscores how Ongoing (led by Prosecutor General’s Office), teams are taking away lessons such as Known security gaps were not addressed, delayed disclosure worsened risks, need for systemic cybersecurity reforms, and recommending next steps like Urgent upgrades to cyber defenses, institutional accountability, early public warnings to mitigate threats, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Government agencies urged to address security gaps, citizens warned of fraud risks.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating accessed through compromised Migration Department accounts. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating hostile state actors exploited known security gaps and Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromised Migration Department accounts. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data including personal identification codes and real estate records. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating theft of over 600,000 records from the Centre of Registers and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating hostile state actors likely exfiltrated data to external systems. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised Migration Department accounts used to avoid detection and Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating domestic agencies failed to address known security gaps. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no direct financial harm confirmed, but fraud risks linger and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating real estate records and personal data compromised. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (50%)
Valid Accounts (90%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (80%)
Disabling Security Tools (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References