Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Dental360 » DEN1769491164

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DEN1769491164)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-55
Company Score Before Incident809 / 1000
Company Score After Incident754 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDEN1769491164
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized server access
DATA EXPOSEDPII and PHI of 11,273...
INCIDENT DATE31/10/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Dental360's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Dental360 Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Dental360 breach identified under incident ID DEN1769491164.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Dental360's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/dental360it, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Medical Practices and the number of employees: 18 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 809 and after the incident was 754 with a difference of -55 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Dental360 and their customers.

On 15 January 2026, 360 Dental PC disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "360 Dental PC Suffers Data Breach Affecting Over 11,000 Patients".

In November 2025, 360 Dental PC, a dental practice in Northeast Philadelphia, detected a cybersecurity breach after an unauthorized party accessed its internal server, locking files and disrupting operations.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Internal server, and exposing PII and PHI of 11,273 individuals, with nearly 11,273 records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Server rebuilds, software updates, additional firewalls, antivirus protection, multi-factor authentication (MFA), restricted VPN access, and began remediation that includes Secure offsite backups, ongoing monitoring, and stakeholders are being briefed through Consumer notice posted, advisories to affected individuals.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Affected individuals advised to place fraud alerts with credit bureaus, review account statements and insurance claims, and check annual credit reports for suspicious activity, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals advised to place fraud alerts with credit bureaus, review account statements and insurance claims, and check annual credit reports for suspicious activity. Those seeking details on their exposed data may contact the practice directly.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party accessed its internal server and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating internal server...disrupting operations. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating files locked and disrupting operations. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files locked and disrupting operations. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, names, dates of birth compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating pII and PHI...exposed via internal server and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating dental records, insurance details, treatment histories compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 11,273 individuals data exposed. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal: File Deletion (T1070.004) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating server rebuilds and software updates implemented post-breach and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating disrupting operations via unauthorized access. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (80%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal: File Deletion (40%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)

Sources & References