Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Delta Security » DEL1769525964

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DEL1769525964)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-14
Company Score Before Incident833 / 1000
Company Score After Incident819 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDEL1769525964
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDDenied by Delta, but unverified...
INCIDENT DATE15/06/2023
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Delta Security's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Delta Security Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Delta Security breach identified under incident ID DEL1769525964.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Delta Security's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/delta-security, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Security and Investigations and the number of employees: 333 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 833 and after the incident was 819 with a difference of -14 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Delta Security and their customers.

On 02 October 2023, Delta disclosed Cyberattack issues under the banner "Delta Security Systems Hit by State-Linked Cyberattack".

A large-scale cyberattack has severely disrupted operations at Delta, a Russian provider of alarm and security systems for homes, businesses, and vehicles.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Alarm systems, car alarms, remote start systems, door locks, website, phone lines, and exposing Denied by Delta, but unverified claims of stolen data exist.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Restoring backups, fending off follow-up strikes, and began remediation that includes Ongoing recovery efforts, while recovery efforts such as Restoring systems from backups continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through Via VKontakte social media page.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Communicated via VKontakte.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating delta’s infrastructure was overwhelmed by the attack and Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating state-linked attack, but no supply chain details confirmed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating service outages, website/phone lines offline, unresponsive systems, Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating communication shifted to VKontakte due to offline systems, and Financial Theft (T1657) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no financial loss reported, but disruption may enable theft. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unverified Telegram channel posted alleged stolen data archive. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating teams worked to restore backups while fending off follow-up strikes and Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (T1070.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating state-linked attack may involve log tampering. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Supply Chain Compromise (30%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service (90%)
Defacement (50%)
Financial Theft (20%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (50%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (40%)

Sources & References