Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Delaware North » DEL1780946592

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DEL1780946592)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-58
Company Score Before Incident376 / 1000
Company Score After Incident318 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDEL1780946592
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORCompromised Employee Account
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information including names, driver’s...
INCIDENT DATE04/06/2026
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Delaware North's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Delaware North Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Delaware North breach identified under incident ID DEL1780946592.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Delaware North's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/delaware-north, the number of followers: 113184, the industry type: Hospitality and the number of employees: 13201 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 376 and after the incident was 318 with a difference of -58 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Delaware North and their customers.

On 05 June 2026, Delaware North disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Delaware North Data Breach Impacting 132 Maine Residents".

Delaware North, a Buffalo, New York-based hospitality and food service company, reported a data breach where an unauthorized actor accessed an employee’s Microsoft account and copied sensitive files, exposing personal information of consumers.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Employee Microsoft account, and exposing Personal information including names, driver’s license numbers, and state-issued identification numbers, with nearly 132 records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and began remediation that includes Providing one year of complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft protection, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifications sent to impacted individuals, toll-free call center established.

The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notifications sent to impacted individuals with instructions for credit monitoring activation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed an employee’s Microsoft account. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating accessed an employee’s Microsoft account (likely via stolen credentials/token) and Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on how the account was initially compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating copied sensitive files containing PII from the employee’s account. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting 132 Maine residents (exfiltration implied) and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating copied sensitive files (likely to attacker-controlled cloud/storage). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data manipulation, but PII exposure enables fraud and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction in the incident. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (T1550.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating accessed account without triggering immediate detection (Jan 27-28). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (90%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (80%)
Brute Force: Password Guessing (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Data Destruction (20%)
Defense Evasion
Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (70%)

Sources & References