Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Defense Intelligence Agency » DEF1766548743

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DEF1766548743)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-59
Company Score Before Incident770 / 1000
Company Score After Incident711 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDEF1766548743
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORInsider access, Physical exfiltration (thumb drive, notepad transcription)
DATA EXPOSEDClassified intelligence products, unprocessed intelligence,...
INCIDENT DATE28/05/2025
STATUSOngoing (as of arrest)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Defense Intelligence Agency's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Defense Intelligence Agency Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Defense Intelligence Agency breach identified under incident ID DEF1766548743.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Defense Intelligence Agency's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/defense-intelligence-agency, the number of followers: 317871, the industry type: Armed Forces and the number of employees: 3396 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 770 and after the incident was 711 with a difference of -59 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Defense Intelligence Agency and their customers.

On 30 May 2024, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) disclosed Insider Threat, Espionage issues under the banner "DIA IT Specialist Arrested for Attempting to Provide Classified Information to Foreign Government".

A civilian IT specialist at the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) was arrested for allegedly trying to hand over classified information to a foreign government agent.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting DIA classified systems, and exposing Classified intelligence products, unprocessed intelligence, assorted classified documentation.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Arrest of suspect, seizure of thumb drive and classified materials, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure by Department of Justice, statements from House Intelligence Committee.

The case underscores how Ongoing (as of arrest), and recommending next steps like Enhanced insider threat monitoring, stricter access controls for classified systems, improved real-time detection of data exfiltration attempts, increased counterintelligence awareness training, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Warnings issued by National Counterintelligence and Security Center, Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, and FBI about foreign recruitment of U.S. government employees.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (100%), with evidence including worked in the DIAs Insider Threat Division since 2019, and insider access to classified systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating offered completed intelligence products, raw intelligence data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exfiltrated data from his workspace, and transcribed classified information onto a notepad and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating offered completed intelligence products, raw intelligence data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Physical Medium: Exfiltration over USB (T1052.001) with high confidence (100%), with evidence including delivered a thumb drive containing classified material, and physical exfiltration (thumb drive) and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating communicating with an undercover FBI agent (foreign entity proxy). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter: Transcription (T1059.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating transcribed classified information onto a notepad to avoid detection and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating thumb drive containing classified material delivered to prearranged location. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating potential compromise of national security, erosion of trust in DIA. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (100%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Physical Medium: Exfiltration over USB (100%)
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Transcription (90%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (70%)
Impact
Defacement: Internal Defacement (80%)

Sources & References