Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » DecoPac, Inc. » DEC1765392005

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DEC1765392005)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-112
Company Score Before Incident761 / 1000
Company Score After Incident649 / 1000
Company LinkView DecoPac, Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERDEC1765392005
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally Identifiable Information (PII), including...
INCIDENT DATE05/12/2024
STATUSSettled (class action)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of DecoPac, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts DecoPac, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the DecoPac, Inc. breach identified under incident ID DEC1765392005.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of DecoPac, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/decopac-inc., the number of followers: 4354, the industry type: Manufacturing and the number of employees: 213 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 761 and after the incident was 649 with a difference of -112 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on DecoPac, Inc. and their customers.

On 06 December 2024, DecoPac Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "DecoPac $400K Data Breach Class Action Settlement".

DecoPac Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally Identifiable Information (PII), including names and Social Security numbers, with nearly 2,860 individuals (employees, spouses, dependents) records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $400,000 (settlement fund).

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure on Dec. 6, 2024; settlement notice to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Settled (class action), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Settlement notice sent to affected individuals with claim instructions.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including unauthorized access to sensitive data, and alleged failure to adequately safeguard PII and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector and vulnerability exploited not specified. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating alleged failure to adequately protect sensitive information. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposure of PII including names and Social Security numbers and Automated Exfiltration (T1020) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacted 2,860 individuals. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of ransomware or data encryption and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References