Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions

Debt-IN is a level 1 BBBEE contributor. Our extensive expertise in debt recovery enables all credit providers in making a difference to their customers' financial health by formulating unique, customized solutions, and building long-term relationships through our unsurpassed commitment to service excellence.

Debt-IN A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Debt-IN

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

debt-in

Employees number:

88

Number of followers:

759

NAICS:

None

Industry Type:

Outsourcing/Offshoring

Homepage:

debt-in.co.za

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

DEB_2300049

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreDebt-IN Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/debt-in.jpeg
Debt-IN Outsourcing/Offshoring
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Get a Score Increase
globalscoreDebt-IN Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/debt-in.jpeg
Debt-IN Outsourcing/Offshoring
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Debt-IN Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
Debt-INRansomware85404/2021NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The South African debt collector Debt-IN suffered a a ransomware attack which exposed as much as 1.4 million personal records of South Africans. FNB, Absa, Standard Bank and African Bank are some of the financial institutions that make use of Debt-IN’s services and thus were impacted by the attack on Debt-IN. These institutions notified their customers about the attack and asked to be alerted of the breach.

Debt-IN
Ransomware
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 04/2021
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The South African debt collector Debt-IN suffered a a ransomware attack which exposed as much as 1.4 million personal records of South Africans. FNB, Absa, Standard Bank and African Bank are some of the financial institutions that make use of Debt-IN’s services and thus were impacted by the attack on Debt-IN. These institutions notified their customers about the attack and asked to be alerted of the breach.

Ailogo

Debt-IN Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Debt-IN

Incidents vs Outsourcing/Offshoring Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Debt-IN in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Debt-IN in 2026.

Incident Types Debt-IN vs Outsourcing/Offshoring Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Debt-IN in 2026.

Incident History — Debt-IN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Debt-IN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Debt-IN Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Debt-IN is a level 1 BBBEE contributor. Our extensive expertise in debt recovery enables all credit providers in making a difference to their customers' financial health by formulating unique, customized solutions, and building long-term relationships through our unsurpassed commitment to service excellence.

Loading...
similarCompanies

Debt-IN Similar Companies

ibex

ibex delivers innovative business process outsourcing (BPO), smart digital marketing, online acquisition technology, and end-to-end customer engagement solutions to help companies acquire, engage and retain valuable customers. Today, ibex operates a global CX delivery center model consisting of appr

newsone

Debt-IN CyberSecurity News

March 31, 2026 01:00 PM
AI agents like OpenClaw could drain crypto wallets via ‘malicious skills’: CertiK

The widespread integration of AI assistants such as OpenClaw introduces critical security risks that open up users to unauthorized actions,...

March 21, 2026 07:50 PM
Overcoming Integration Debt in Security Operations

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA – In today's hyper-connected threat landscape, enterprise Security Operations Centers (SOCs) invest heavily in advanced SIEM,...

March 19, 2026 11:00 AM
Goldman Sachs Investment in Cybersecurity and Debt Impact

Discover how Goldman Sachs' bold moves in cybersecurity and debt issuance could reshape its long-term risk strategy and impact the financial...

March 19, 2026 07:00 AM
Enhancing SOC Efficiency with Professional Integration

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA – In an era marked by an increasingly interconnected threat environment, enterprise Security Operations Centers...

March 18, 2026 07:00 AM
Should Goldman Sachs’ (GS) Cybersecurity Bet and Debt Issuance Shift Its Long‑Term Risk Narrative?

In recent weeks, Goldman Sachs has been highly active in debt markets, issuing a series of fixed and floating-rate notes across maturities...

March 06, 2026 08:00 AM
How the National Cyber Strategy Secures Our Digital Way of Life

Palo Alto Networks applauds the new National Cyber Strategy. We detail our support for key aspects of its six pillars, to include AI...

March 02, 2026 08:00 AM
Iran-Backed Hackers Aim for Economic Disruption

Proxies are claiming to launch retaliatory cyberattacks targeting financial services and other businesses, as well as critical...

March 02, 2026 08:00 AM
Students say NC State cybersecurity course left them in debt and without prospects

After having been promised a voucher to take an industry-standard certification exam, CompTIA Security+, the students were informed that they'd...

February 25, 2026 08:00 AM
Ransomware is the invoice for compounding technical debt

The business impact of a cyber-attack for any organisation includes financial loss and reputational damage, as well as legal and regulatory...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Debt-IN CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Debt-IN

The official website of Debt-IN is https://debt-in.co.za/.

Debt-IN’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Debt-IN’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 711, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does Debt-IN’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Debt-IN currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Debt-IN been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Debt-IN has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Debt-IN have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Debt-IN is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Debt-IN have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Debt-IN does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Debt-IN comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Debt-IN is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Debt-IN have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Debt-IN does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Debt-IN comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Debt-IN is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Debt-IN have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Debt-IN is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Debt-IN

Debt-IN operates primarily in the Outsourcing/Offshoring industry.

Number of Employees at Debt-IN

Debt-IN employs approximately 88 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Debt-IN

Debt-IN presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Debt-IN’s LinkedIn Followers

Debt-IN’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 759 followers.

NAICS Classification of Debt-IN

Debt-IN is classified under the NAICS code None, which corresponds to Others.

Debt-IN’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Debt-IN does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Debt-IN’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Debt-IN maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/debt-in.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Debt-IN

As of April 04, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Debt-IN has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Debt-IN has an estimated 268 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Debt-IN ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.

How does Debt-IN detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an communication strategy with customers were notified about the attack and asked to be alerted of the breach...

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack

Title: Ransomware Attack on Debt-IN

Description: The South African debt collector Debt-IN suffered a ransomware attack which exposed as much as 1.4 million personal records of South Africans.

Type: Ransomware Attack

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DEB2234111022

Data Compromised: Personal records

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Records.

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DEB2234111022

Entity Name: Debt-IN

Entity Type: Debt Collector

Industry: Financial Services

Location: South Africa

Customers Affected: 1400000

Incident : Ransomware Attack DEB2234111022

Entity Name: FNB

Entity Type: Financial Institution

Industry: Banking

Location: South Africa

Incident : Ransomware Attack DEB2234111022

Entity Name: Absa

Entity Type: Financial Institution

Industry: Banking

Location: South Africa

Incident : Ransomware Attack DEB2234111022

Entity Name: Standard Bank

Entity Type: Financial Institution

Industry: Banking

Location: South Africa

Incident : Ransomware Attack DEB2234111022

Entity Name: African Bank

Entity Type: Financial Institution

Industry: Banking

Location: South Africa

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DEB2234111022

Communication Strategy: Customers were notified about the attack and asked to be alerted of the breach.

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DEB2234111022

Type of Data Compromised: Personal Records

Number of Records Exposed: 1400000

Investigation Status

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Customers were notified about the attack and asked to be alerted of the breach..

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Ransomware Attack DEB2234111022

Customer Advisories: Customers were notified about the attack and asked to be alerted of the breach.

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was Customers were notified about the attack and asked to be alerted of the breach..

Additional Questions

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal Records and .

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was Personal Records.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 140.0.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Customers were notified about the attack and asked to be alerted of the breach.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=debt-in' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge