What is the official website of de Baak ?

The official website of de Baak is http://www.debaak.nl.

What is de Baak's cybersecurity risk score?

de Baak has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 759 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has de Baak experienced?

According to Rankiteo, de Baak currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has de Baak been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, de Baak has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does de Baak have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, de Baak is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does de Baak have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, de Baak does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does de Baak comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, de Baak is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does de Baak have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, de Baak does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does de Baak comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, de Baak is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does de Baak have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,de Baak is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does de Baak operate in ?

de Baak operates primarily in the Professionele training en coaching industry.

How many employees does de Baak have ?

de Baak employs approximately 552 people worldwide.

Does de Baak own any subsidiaries ?

de Baak presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does de Baak have ?

de Baak's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 53,779 followers.

Does de Baak have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, de Baak does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does de Baak have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, de Baak maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/debaak.

How many cybersecurity incidents has de Baak experienced ?

As of August 16, 2026, Rankiteo reports that de Baak has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does de Baak have ?

de Baak has an estimated 4 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

de Baak

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

759

/1000

Fair

784

/1000

Fair

de Baak Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

debaak.nl

Add Your Compliance Badge

We kunnen en willen tegenwoordig zoveel, dat het steeds moeilijker wordt om de juiste keuzes te maken. Hoe weet je wat echt belangrijk en de moeite waard is? Hoe vind je de weg in een wereld vol keuzes? Op school, in de collegebanken en het bedrijfsleven wordt ons geleerd hoe we moeten denken en beslissen. Ratio, logica en sterke argumenten zijn leidend bij het maken van beslissingen. Nadenken alleen brengt ons niet altijd verder—sterker nog, het werkt vaak verlammend. Je loopt vast in een patroon van overdenken, twijfelen en het afwegen van voor- en nadelen. We vergeten een hersenhelft mee te nemen in onze beslissingen. Een instrument dat geraffineerder is dan we denken: onze intuïtie. Om iets te weten te komen, moet je denken en

de Baak A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

de Baak

de Baak CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

de Baak Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for de Baak

Incidents vs Professionele training en coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for de Baak in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for de Baak in 2026.

Incident Types de Baak vs Professionele training en coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for de Baak in 2026.

Incident History - de Baak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

de Baak Subsidiaries

de Baak

Professionele training en coaching

Website: http://www.debaak.nl

Company Size: 552

Salta GroupEducation Administration Programs

NCOI OpleidingenEducatiebeleid

LOIE-learning

Bestuursacademie NederlandEducatiebeleid

NIBE-SVV Opleidingen‎Financiële diensten

NTIE-learningopleidingen

SchoeversEducatiebeleid

SRM Opleidingen en TrainingenProfessionele training en coaching

Tio Business SchoolHoger onderwijs

Markus Verbeek PraehepBoekhouding

ISBW Opleiding & TrainingOnderwijsmanagement

ROVC Technische OpleidingenEducatiebeleid

SchrijversacademieEducatiebeleid

AALO opleidingen | Fitness & HealthKijksporten

Opleiding.nl ZakelijkEducation Administration Programs

BloomvilleHuman Resources Services

Instituut BlankestijnPrimary and Secondary Education

EVC NederlandEducation Management

ComputrainIT-services en consultancy

SkillsTownE-Learning Providers

LuzacEducatiebeleid

Pro EducationEducatiebeleid

Online AcademyE-learningopleidingen

Scheidegger OpleidingenEducatiebeleid

NCOI LearningProfessional Training and Coaching

Loading…

de Baak Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

de Baak CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-19917

SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in code-projects Online Food Order System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file delete_food_items1.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument checkbox can lead to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

Published

Date2026-08-15

Updated

Date2026-08-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)

cvss2

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-74767

SUMMARY

Pandora contains a denial-of-service vulnerability in its handling of DAA (Direct Access Archive) files. When extracting the internal ISO image from a DAA archive, compressed chunks were decompressed using zlib.decompress() without enforcing a limit on the resulting uncompressed data. An attacker able to submit a crafted DAA file containing highly compressed data could cause Pandora to decompress a relatively small input into a very large amount of data in memory. Because the decompressed chunks are accumulated to construct the internal ISO image, this could result in excessive memory consumption and potentially CPU exhaustion, causing the extraction worker to become unresponsive, terminate, or affect the availability of the Pandora service. The patch introduces bounded decompression using decompressobj().decompress() with max_extracted_filesize, verifies the cumulative size of decompressed chunks, and raises a dedicated ZipBomb exception when the configured limit is exceeded. Pandora then aborts extraction and reports the file as too large.

Published

Date2026-08-15

Updated

Date2026-08-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/pandora-analysis/pandora/commit/f4294a873f86fbf2569c289e329fff2f52ca50c9

CVE-2026-74764

SUMMARY

Pandora contains a path traversal vulnerability in its TAR archive extraction functionality. When processing a submitted TAR archive, the extractor passed archive member names directly to Python's tarfile.TarFile.extract() without applying an extraction filter. An attacker able to submit a specially crafted TAR archive containing malicious member paths, such as paths using ../ sequences or absolute paths, could cause extracted files to be written outside the intended extraction directory. This may allow the attacker to overwrite files accessible to the Pandora worker process and could potentially result in application compromise, arbitrary code execution, or denial of service depending on the files targeted and the privileges of the Pandora process. The vulnerability is corrected by using Python's filter='data' extraction filter, which rejects or sanitizes dangerous TAR members, including paths that escape the destination directory and unsafe link targets. The weakness corresponds to MITRE's general path traversal category, which includes archive extraction cases where attacker-controlled filenames cause files to be written outside the intended directory.

Published

Date2026-08-15

Updated

Date2026-08-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 10.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/pandora-analysis/pandora/commit/186b58d41e04248a154d274fffb5813e7fa2012e

CVE-2026-73055

SUMMARY

Shescape before 2.1.15 (and 3.0.0 before 3.0.2) fails to properly escape tilde (~) characters in assignment contexts on Unix systems where the shell is explicitly configured to "sh" or true and /bin/sh points to BusyBox. Using the escape and escapeAll APIs with untrusted input in an assignment prefixed to a command, an attacker can inject a tilde payload to disclose the user's home directory location and, depending on usage, alter the location on which a command operates.

Published

Date2026-08-15

Updated

Date2026-08-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.8

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

2.5

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-73054

SUMMARY

SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the WebSocket endpoint caused by differential parsing of query parameters between authentication exemption and session quarantine checks. Unauthenticated attackers can craft a malicious WebSocket URI with duplicated query parameters to bypass access auth code validation and receive the live kernel event stream including document identifiers, titles, and operation logs.

Published

Date2026-08-15

Updated

Date2026-08-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…