Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Davies North America » DAV2113421112625

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DAV2113421112625)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-82
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident673 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERDAV2113421112625
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDProtected Health Information (PHI)
INCIDENT DATE30/04/2025
STATUSOngoing (limited details available)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Davies North America's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Davies North America Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Davies North America breach identified under incident ID DAV2113421112625.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Davies North America's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/daviesnorthamerica, the number of followers: 15795, the industry type: Insurance and the number of employees: 778 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 673 with a difference of -82 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Davies North America and their customers.

On 29 September 2025, Thomas Davies disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Thomas Davies Data Breach Involving Protected Health Information".

Thomas Davies discovered a data breach where sensitive protected health information (PHI) in its systems may have been accessed.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Protected Health Information (PHI), with nearly 14,500+ records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Planned notifications to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing (limited details available), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Pending (notifications to affected individuals planned).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its systems (no vector specified, but implies credential misuse). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive protected health information (PHI) in its systems may have been accessed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Possible (accessed) (no explicit method, but PHI exposure implies transfer). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism (T1598) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating risks of identity theft, medical fraud, or targeted phishing attacks (secondary misuse of PHI) and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating breach could injure or kill people (hypothetical worst-case impact). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References