Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Davies, McFarland & Carroll, LLC » DAV1764612288

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DAV1764612288)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-85
Company Score Before Incident751 / 1000
Company Score After Incident666 / 1000
Company LinkView Davies, McFarland & Carroll, LLC Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERDAV1764612288
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally Identifiable Information (PII)
INCIDENT DATE30/11/2025
STATUSOngoing (Lynch Carpenter, LLP investigating claims)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Davies, McFarland & Carroll, LLC's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Davies, McFarland & Carroll, LLC Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Davies, McFarland & Carroll, LLC breach identified under incident ID DAV1764612288.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Davies, McFarland & Carroll, LLC's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/davies-mcfarland-carroll-llc, the number of followers: 151, the industry type: Law Practice and the number of employees: 17 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 666 with a difference of -85 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Davies, McFarland & Carroll, LLC and their customers.

On 01 December 2025, Davies, McFarland, and Carroll LLC disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Data Breach at Davies, McFarland, and Carroll LLC".

An unauthorized person gained access to Davies, McFarland, and Carroll LLC's systems and may have acquired records containing personally identifiable information (PII), impacting over fifty thousand individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally Identifiable Information (PII), with nearly 50,000+ records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure via Globe Newswire; legal firm (Lynch Carpenter, LLP) investigating claims and offering case reviews for affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing (Lynch Carpenter, LLP investigating claims), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals advised to contact Lynch Carpenter, LLP for case review via website (https://www.lynchcarpenter.com) or phone/email (Jerry Wells at (412) 322-9243 or [email protected]).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized person gained access to Davies’s systems (implies misuse of valid credentials or accounts) and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized person gained access (no vector specified; public-facing app is common for law firms). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating may have acquired records containing personally identifiable information (PII). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating records may have been acquired (implies data was exfiltrated via unknown method). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data from Cloud Storage (T1530) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating pII exposed (law firms often store client data in cloud; no explicit cloud mention but implied) and Data Manipulation (T1565) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating potential identity theft risk (PII exposure could enable manipulation, though not confirmed). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References